1. Derek claimed he didn't "bust" her but was acting on a tip. Most likely one of his band of trolls told him and he emailed the RD. He tries to do this all the time (and he posts here under numerous names to drive traffic to his site)
2. He harassed her on facebook so he couldn't hid his usually method of stalking.
3. The woman is a little nutty but Derek is a world class stalker.
MeHereYouWhere?! wrote:
Those who can, run
Those who can't, tri
Those who still can't, cheat
Those who can, run
Those who can't, tri
Those who still can't, cheat
Those who are pathetic losers who can't get enough sex at home, stalk the cheaters.
It’s from the template. What browser are you using. I don’t have an issue in my end..but have heard that complaint before.
I'm naturally suspicious of all triathaletes, democrats, chiropractors, ex-circus clowns,
Instagram models, professional golfer's wives, and Jamin haters.
M.A.G.A...
The ranting of understanding the shooters in mass shootings is disturbing.
Emailing the superintendent (
https://www.kyrene.org/Page/37036
) and Governing Board (
https://www.kyrene.org/Page/23908
) will ensure she won't be a substitute teacher at Kyrene School District anymore.
Her phone number is listed in some online classified ads...someone ought to text her and ask her side.
Karl Hungus wrote:
senior citizen reader wrote:
I haven't heard "RCH" used since my Vietnam era Navy days. Pretty sure it's not PC anymore, if it ever was.
I do a fair amount of carpentry as a hobby and it's used a lot.
Karl "I nail boards, not Broads" Hungus.
posting private correspondences is very poor form.
maffeboner wrote:
posting private correspondences is very poor form.
So is being an elementary school teacher who publicly posts rants about "understanding school shooters" because she got caught cheating.
doubler wrote:
It’s from the template. What browser are you using. I don’t have an issue in my end..but have heard that complaint before.
Chrome on a Mac
maffeboner wrote:
posting private correspondences is very poor form.
Agreed. The lack of morality from a supposed white knight is hypocritical.
maffeboner wrote:
posting private correspondences is very poor form.
Who did that? The 'Pollack' comments were posted on her FB feed.
Rather than just reporting the facts regarding suspected cheaters. Murph has gone from publicly humiliating to doxing, stalking and judging. He is clearly off the rails and appears to be seeking revenge. Posting opinions like this will eventually, at the very least get him sued. The cheaters are obviously crazy but triggering sociopaths shows that he ain't the smartest piggy in Cincy.
Like many cops, Murph is becoming as dirty as the people he is going after.
"It is worth noting that xxxxxx is a teacher. I do not know if or where she is currently employed. But according to the latest information I could find she was employed as a substitute teacher as of last Spring. This type of reaction is disturbing enough on it’s own. Coming from an elementary school teacher makes it that much worse, in my opinion."
Flying Piggy wrote:
Rather than just reporting the facts regarding suspected cheaters. Murph has gone from publicly humiliating to doxing, stalking and judging. He is clearly off the rails and appears to be seeking revenge. Posting opinions like this will eventually, at the very least get him sued. The cheaters are obviously crazy but triggering sociopaths shows that he ain't the smartest piggy in Cincy.
Like many cops, Murph is becoming as dirty as the people he is going after.
"It is worth noting that xxxxxx is a teacher. I do not know if or where she is currently employed. But according to the latest information I could find she was employed as a substitute teacher as of last Spring. This type of reaction is disturbing enough on it’s own. Coming from an elementary school teacher makes it that much worse, in my opinion."
Ok, let me understand what you are saying. So, a teacher is making multiple public comments about empathizing about school and mass shootings. And this Murph guy sees that as troubling and is trying to do something about it. And you see this as a bad thing? What?
The bad thing is triggering a sociopath.
I don't think Murph is qualified to substantiate her rantings or to psycho-analyze her based on her facebook postings. Reporting her to the proper authorities would be reasonable, but then he should drop it. Someone already outed her for cheating and she was DQ'd. What followed from Murphy was not necessary. He is trying to drive traffic to his own website using someone else's work and shaming a person.
The fact is that he triggered her and harassed her. After she told him to leave her alone he then posted their conversation on his blog. Publicly posting his diatribe with her after she asked him to leave her alone puts him in a precarious legal position in the event that she actually does something dangerous. Then on LRC he continues to poke at a person that he thinks is unstable. That's just stupid.
He has gone from posting cheating reports to digging into and invading people's personal lives. This woman is not a celebrity and by blocking him on FB she illustrated that she wants no further contact with him. Murphy is now clearly just trying to hurt people through a business that he is trying profit from.
Flying Piggy wrote:
The bad thing is triggering a sociopath.
I don't think Murph is qualified to substantiate her rantings or to psycho-analyze her based on her facebook postings. Reporting her to the proper authorities would be reasonable, but then he should drop it. Someone already outed her for cheating and she was DQ'd. What followed from Murphy was not necessary. He is trying to drive traffic to his own website using someone else's work and shaming a person.
The fact is that he triggered her and harassed her. After she told him to leave her alone he then posted their conversation on his blog. Publicly posting his diatribe with her after she asked him to leave her alone puts him in a precarious legal position in the event that she actually does something dangerous. Then on LRC he continues to poke at a person that he thinks is unstable. That's just stupid.
He has gone from posting cheating reports to digging into and invading people's personal lives. This woman is not a celebrity and by blocking him on FB she illustrated that she wants no further contact with him. Murphy is now clearly just trying to hurt people through a business that he is trying profit from.
She is responsible for her own actions and should be forced to answer for her comments about school shootings given her position. Authorities should be notified. This is not a joking matter.
John Utah wrote:
Flying Piggy wrote:
Rather than just reporting the facts regarding suspected cheaters. Murph has gone from publicly humiliating to doxing, stalking and judging. He is clearly off the rails and appears to be seeking revenge. Posting opinions like this will eventually, at the very least get him sued. The cheaters are obviously crazy but triggering sociopaths shows that he ain't the smartest piggy in Cincy.
Like many cops, Murph is becoming as dirty as the people he is going after.
"It is worth noting that xxxxxx is a teacher. I do not know if or where she is currently employed. But according to the latest information I could find she was employed as a substitute teacher as of last Spring. This type of reaction is disturbing enough on it’s own. Coming from an elementary school teacher makes it that much worse, in my opinion."
Ok, let me understand what you are saying. So, a teacher is making multiple public comments about empathizing about school and mass shootings. And this Murph guy sees that as troubling and is trying to do something about it. And you see this as a bad thing? What?
Hi Derek!
In all of these kind of threads you get the "leave the cheats alone" people - I find it really hard to believe that these people are not cheats themselves being triggered and defensive
ExpertKipWatcher wrote:
In all of these kind of threads you get the "leave the cheats alone" people - I find it really hard to believe that these people are not cheats themselves being triggered and defensive
People committing misdeeds typically want to be left alone to continue what they are doing.
ExpertKipWatcher wrote:
In all of these kind of threads you get the "leave the cheats alone" people - I find it really hard to believe that these people are not cheats themselves being triggered and defensive
Derek, I never said to leave the cheats alone. Her cheating was already taken care of by the RD before you stuck your nose up her butt.
"Reporting her to the proper authorities would be reasonable, but then he should drop it. Someone already outed her for cheating and she was DQ'd. "