EPO 'doesn't work,' scientists claim (Lancet study)

In 1998, The Lancet published Andrew Wakefield's fraudulent study claiming vaccines caused Autism. They didn't retract it until 2010. The Lancet has zero ethics, and even less credibility.

smdshbvd wrote:

NYCMaster wrote:

It turns out that the cyclists given EPO showed roughly 3% better maximal power output and 5% better VO2-max, BUT submaximal performance was not affected.

This is exactly why it's most beneficial to cyclists in the Tour. Elevated hemoglobin levels are most effective at maximum aerobic effort like when attempting a breakaway during a mountain stage. Once the break has been established, the riders settle into a steady state in which the extra capacity is of little to no benefit. The data shows how doping with EPO works, then the authors whitewash their own findings. Strange.

But wouldn't work on TT's where the tour is often won.

Are you sure this was not the journal of Lance?

so if wada /iaaf / nike and their agents put propagandist stuff

like this out there for whatever agenda at that time,

no ends to what other tricks they get up to.

they want total control over athletics and nearly there

so where would they stop ,

1.

giving certain chosen athletes freedom to dope ,

push these athletes careers as best as can , especially media

avoid losing as much as possible , run in weakened fields ,etc

get the best dope ,that other athletes would never get ,

best set ups ,train where no testing etc ,coaches , etc etc

these chosen athletes usually come with agenda of own ,

to highlight certain nations and take dominance from others .

ie like south african track at moment

2.

letting whole nations dope and then blame other nations for doping

enabling these countries to remain dominant and corner events even more

and shut down them in other nations so cant compete,

having their agent /track managers and coaches organize and control

doping in their group and other circles

3.

try to control the dope of choice as best can , by any means

igf-1 lr3 the speed peptide best example to date

where wont test for it , mention it in media and assess to it quite

well controlled as needs to be pharmacy grade .

where wada comes in , especially their mouthpieces in media

4

wont test for other types of epo molecules or isotope test for testosterone

and when new ped comes out , try best to control it like the whole

meldonium fiasco , banned it made similar molecule that wont test for

and now handing out to their select athletes usually nike

..................................................................................................

5.

that they wont push other memes in track like is being done in society

by the moneymen /satanists or whoever want to call

not pushing transgenderism at all in track , afew years ago what happenin

in womens 800m would never be tolerated and wasnt ,

so what changed . that event can only be rivalled by womens tennis which has pushed the same rubbish for decades now .

6.

alot of evidence for above

so would it not be stretch of imagination to suggest that

they could even manipulate the times of certain races to some degree

if deemed fit ,

easily get away with up to 0.04-0.06 seconds before notice handtimed

afew hundreds of second here or there that couldnt possibly

know about unless working the actual timing systems themselves

a slight delay at start or end from normal timing or moving of photo finish

to match this time too .

getting finish clock to stop at certain time all easily done in moments