Can't wait for the blowhards with no biology education to chime in on this one.
Can't wait for the blowhards with no biology education to chime in on this one.
GhostofTedKennedy wrote:
HeartLandValues wrote:The shocking thing is she presents herself as a Christian and wears her Christianity promptly on her sleeve. So how then did this happen?
+1
Heard her blabbing about her Christian values, but a late stage abortion proves she puts money and fame first.
Where is it said that it was late stage? That may be the case but I have not seen it.
Instead of having a child out of wedlock they could have just gotten married - she could have had the baby and the gold but she decided to abort - shame
Because you douchbags care so much about black babies.
Again, she volunteered this information.
I wonder how many people would volunteer their darkest moments to the public for judgement.
A lot of perfect people here.
Ioffe wrote:
Because you douchbags care so much about black babies.
Don't Black Lives Matter to you?
Bollocks, mate wrote:
adsfsdafasd wrote:First of all, you ought to provide a source when you quote something. In this case I found it on SI.
Second, it's not a baby, it's a fetus.
Third, how many times do you think a female athlete can get pregnant and remain competitive? Surely her sponsors would prefer that she competes in the Olympics than have another child.
Fourth, you're setting up a false comparison. Do you think the decision really boiled down to trading a fetus for some medals, or do you think it was maybe a little more complex than that? Don't be ignorant.
Let me address your concerns: OK, I should have provided a source. Glad you found it.
Second, it is fetus that will grow into a baby. I'm not getting into a pissing contest about the definition of it. One thing that we DO know - it was something that was alive, and an abortion killed it.
Third, having never been a female (or pregnant for that matter) I don't know. "Her sponsors?" When it comes down to it, who is she going to listen to, herself and the father of her child, or her sponsors? You're making her out to be awfully cold-blooded if the preference of her sponsors was the deciding factor.
Fourth : yes, I do believe it boiled down to trading a baby (what I'm going to call it since that was what it would have become in less than 9 months) for medals. I think I'd have a lot more respect for her if she was honest about the driving factor. I very much doubt that it was fear of finger-pointing from the public.
I'm far from ignorant. I am one who questions the motivation of this decision, and since she put this VERY private decision out into the public sphere, people are entitled to their opinions on it. I have expressed mine.
Good day.
2. "It will grow into a baby" -- I mean it might, or it might not, one day in the future, become a baby. But like my sperm one day might become a baby too, does the fact that I'm not impregnating a woman with it equal killing something? You don't want to get into a pissing contest about it because you know your indignation hinges on whether abortion is murder, and you refuse to acknowledge that this is subjective. Many people believe life begins at the moment of conception, but we kill living things all the time -- bugs, weeds, rats, etc. A human fetus still has a tail a month after conception. What makes us special is the identity we develop, not the chemical process of development.
3. Again, it's only cold-blooded if you think abortion is murder. Your original statement was "I do NOT believe the narrative that her church, sponsors, and fans would turn on her." -- I don't know anything about her church and fans so I wrote about her sponsors.
4. Again, I think this is her decision and I don't think it's right of you to try to shame her for it.
It's completely up to Sonya.
Also, Mother Teresa was kind of a jerk - she loved being surrounded by poor dying people yet doing very little to relieve suffering while taking money from a bunch of questionable people.
Karl Hungus wrote:
It's completely up to Sonya.
Also, Mother Teresa was kind of a jerk - she loved being surrounded by poor dying people yet doing very little to relieve suffering while taking money from a bunch of questionable people.
"Doing very little to relieve suffering." Bruh, have you ever read a book about Mother Teresa? I would love to see you give a few days doing what she did with the poorest of Calcutta's poor and get back to me. Her religious order is now worldwide serving people at the margins of society.
But everyone freak out because she took some mafia money to feed some starving people. Get over yourself.
Subway Surfers Addiction wrote:
Why do people see the need to tell us about this...
My question too. Like the Kiwi and his porn.
Mother Theresa was all about raising awareness rather than fixing problems.
I am pro choice because I believe legal protection for the infant should begin at birth not at conception. If your'e going to prosecute a mother for an abortion, then legally you should also prosecute moms who abuse their bodies while pregnant with alcohol, cigarettes, poor nutrition or drugs resulting in harm to the baby.
But even though I am pro choice I think it is morally wrong to have an abortion for reasons of inconvenience as appears to be the case here. If she was worried about sponsors and fans and what they thought she could have got married before giving birth. Depending on how far gone she was I suspect she could even have competed (Alysia Montano competed in a very pregnant state at national championships). To further justify her action by saying that she does not know of any female track athlete that has not had an abortion is disingenuous to say the least.
Best of luck to her.
Anyone else wonder is she's a screamer?
telecran wrote:
"Doing very little to relieve suffering." Bruh, have you ever read a book about Mother Teresa? I would love to see you give a few days doing what she did with the poorest of Calcutta's poor and get back to me. Her religious order is now worldwide serving people at the margins of society.
But everyone freak out because she took some mafia money to feed some starving people. Get over yourself.
You say mafia, I say third world dictators with a laundry list of human rights violations. You say "serving people", I say exploiting natives to convert them to Catholicism. You say "did with the poorest", I say ran homes for the dying with no or inept medical care.
Sure, it's easy to blame me for what seems like deep seated denial. But whatever helps you sleep at night.
Star wrote:
It would be interesting how surprised we would be if we knew of every abortion.
This is mostly shocking because no one would normally volunteer this information.
Some of your mothers or wives or other dear ones may have had an abortion that you have no idea about.
Yeah this is 100% true. I had an unplanned and unwanted pregnancy a few years back, at the start of my Boston marathon taper. Not only did I not want kids, but the pregnancy made me very ill. Getting an abortion wasn't even an issue I grappled with, it was a given. I was 36 at the time and the ladies in the clinic were very surprised that it was my first one because abortions are SO COMMON. You'd never suspect anyone either, because no one would ever admit to it! The only person I ever told was my sister, when she was drunk so I didn't think she'd remember.
adsfsdafasd wrote:
Second, it's not a baby, it's a fetus.
Next time you're talking to a pregnant woman and she refers to her "baby", make sure you correct her and see what kind of reaction you get.
this is sad wrote:
Yeah to kill a child because of the inconvenience it would cause is messed up. That narrative definitely isn't true, but even if things turned out even worse than what she could imagine it still doesn't justify it. I pretty much liberal in every area except abortion, I believe that in a hundred years it will be the thing we will look back on with horror like we do with slavery and the holocaust.
Jesus! How dare you tell a woman she is as evil as Hitler murdering millions of innocent people, for simply removing a bunch of cells.
LATE abortion if it's not for serious medical reasons is not good.
But dont you dare dictate what a woman can do with her body when it's just a few cells. Judgemental lunatic.
DaneRauschenberg wrote:
Gold Medal> a baby(a creation of God). In the end when she make's a full accounting of her life, this may very well come up. Pass or fail. Up or down.
I would trade a baby for an Olympic medal any day of the week. It doesn't even have to be my baby. How many people have babies every year? How many Olympic medals are given out every year? That's a no brainer trade.
Karl Hungus wrote:
It's completely up to Sonya.
Also, Mother Teresa was kind of a jerk - she loved being surrounded by poor dying people yet doing very little to relieve suffering while taking money from a bunch of questionable people.
What rot. You seem to have drunk the Kool-Aid that Christopher Hitchens served. St. Theresa founded hospices, not hospitals, and tried to comfort the dying. She and her nuns also trained people how to use Natural Family Planning (NFP) methods (I'm unsure which particular one or ones, but popular ones include the Billings ovulation method and the Creighton model). These are often ridiculed but they are fertility awareness methods that do not alter women's natural cycles by monkey-wrenching or poisoning them. They allow couples to time intercourse to avoid or achieve pregnancy. They are essentially free, too - rather important in places like Calcutta (Kolkatta). Yep, NFP methods require strong wills but can work quite effectively.
Here's an extract of something posted on this board about Hitchens regarding St. Theresa and others:
May God bless Christopher Hitchens.
I heard Christopher Hitchens interviewed a few times, read a few articles about some of his debates, and sometimes read his own writings of which I here address just three: (1) a less than one-page article he wrote on Gandhi and Maximilian Kolbe which appeared in "The Nation" in 1983, (2) his book published in 1997 on that "Villain of Villains" (to borrow a phrase of Christopher Buckley uttered sarcastically in defense of that "Villain"), Mother Teresa ("The Missionary Position: Mother Teresa in Theory and Practice" - I wonder whether it was Hitchens, the publisher, or someone else who titled the book), and (3) "god is not Great" published in 2009.
In "The Nation" article on Gandhi and Kolbe, Hitchens dismisses them both as unholy fakirs and, on a tissue of evidence and ignoring abundant and robust evidence contrariwise, called Kolbe an anti-Semite who got what he deserved at Auschwitz. The article was written in 1983 shortly after the Catholic Church canonized Kolbe as a saint in 1982. (I will leave to others any defense of Gandhi as I am less familiar with his history and I do not share as many beliefs with him as I do with Kolbe and the Blessed Teresa of Calcutta (increasingly "Kolkata")).
In "god is not Great" (p. 241 in the 2009 hardback) Hitchens wrote (presumably of Kolbe) of "a rather ambivalent priest who - after a long record of political anti-Semitism in Poland - had apparently behaved nobly in Auschwitz."
Kolbe (1894-1941) was a Pole who earned two doctorates as part of his formation as a priest and Franciscan Friar (the various Franciscan orders derive their names from St. Francis of Assisi (1182-1226)). Kolbe was head of a Franciscan friary (of about 700 men) in Poland while Poland was under siege first by Russian Communists and later by Nazis. He hid roughly 3,000 Poles, including an estimated 300 - 1,500 Jews, in the friary at considerable risk to himself, to the other friars, and to the Catholic Church. He encouraged others to hide Jews as well, and specifically instructed his fellow Franciscans not to inflame anti-Semitic sentiments - Kolbe had a media apostolate, producing Catholic newspapers, magazines, and the like. He even is reported to have organized the delivery of gifts to the Jewish children hidden in the Friary (the Christian children had received gifts for Christmas which the Jewish children did not celebrate). Kolbe spoke fluent German and was offered German citizenship but refused it. His father, Julius Kolbe, was a Polish patriot, one of Pilsudski's patriots, who battled against Bolsheviks in his efforts for the independence of a partitioned Poland, and for this Julius was hanged in 1914. The Nazis arrested Maximilian Kolbe in 1939 but eventually released him, only to arrest him again in 1941 on the charge that he was an intellectual. He was sent to Pawiak prison in February 1941, and in May 1941 was transferred to Auschwitz, often described as labor camp and a death camp.
Numerous records attest to Kolbe's behavior at Auschwitz. He shared his meager food rations with other detainees, and he blessed the Nazi's who almost beat him to death. In July 1941, a prisoner was unaccounted for and presumed to have escaped (reports indicate he was later found drowned in a latrine). To deter escapes, the Nazis assembled prisoners and selected ten for death by starvation. Franciszek Gajowniczek, a Polish army sergeant and one of the ten, cried out in despair for his wife and three children. It was then that Fr. Kolbe broke from the ranks, presented himself to deputy commander SS-Hauptsturmführer Karl Fritzsch while politely removing his own prisoner's cap, and spoke words approximating these: "I wish to take the place of that man. He has a wife and children. I am old and alone. I am a Catholic priest from Poland." (Fr. Kolbe was 47 years old; Sergeant Gajowniczek was 39). Commander Fritsch agreed to the switch. Kolbe and the other nine men (there may be no record of their identities), were marched to a starvation bunker, stripped, and locked inside. After about ten days, only four, including Kolbe, remained alive, though Kolbe suffered tuberculosis for most of his life. After a few more days, on 14 August 1941, Nazis gave lethal injections to the four, first to the two unconscious prisoners then to the two conscious prisoners. Fr. Kolbe was the last of the four to receive an injection. He died within a few seconds. His body was cremated the next day as hundreds of thousands would be over several years. Sergeant Gajowniczek, the man spared by Kolbe's courage, died in 1995 at 93 years of age.
Hitchens’ criticisms of Teresa of Calcutta are quite lame. Hitchens tries to persuade his audience that Teresa loved poverty but not the poor. If you are fairly well instructed in Catholicism, you will find Hitchens' criticisms littered with his own misunderstanding on numerous points: he confuses the Virginal Conception (the belief that Jesus was conceived by a virgin, Mary) with the Immaculate Conception (that Mary's soul was created without original sin in a relationship with God similar to that of Adam and Eve's relationship with God before the Fall) and shows little comprehension of Catholic teaching regarding birth control, for example, the paradigmatic difference between artificial birth control, which the Catholic Church opposes) and natural family planning (NFP), of which, for the right reasons, the Catholic Church approves. NFP methods are fertility awareness methods that do not impair a woman's cyclical fertility or a man's fairly constant fertility (the Catholic Church encouraged the development of the various NFP methods: the Billings ovulation method, the Creighton method, and other symptomatic or thermal methods). He faults Teresa for calling abortion the greatest destroyer of peace in the world, though he himself elsewhere calls abortion an abomination, and neglects to offer his opinion on what precisely is a greater offender than abortion.
I'll stop there. I hope to write a book about Hitchens' take on Kolbe, Teresa and Pope Pius XII. Hitchens strikes me as an elegant stylist, but extremely lazy with regard to research, and a remarkable bigot.
There is overwhelming evidence that early Christians prayed for the dead and that this was viewed favorably by the Fathers of the Church, and Catholics, Orthodox, and a few Protestants continue to pray for the dead. I believe in the incredible mercy of God and pray for the salvation of Christopher Hitchens.
WP
That's what everyone says....I can't tell you how many times I have heard birth control that's 99.9% fails. What they fail to mention is they forgot to take the pill one day...or took antibiotics while on it...or forgot to put the condom on lol Birth control "failing" is an excuse used by so many so as not to be called irresponsible. I don't think SRR even said this anyway. Bottom line, with THE OLYMPICS COMING UP WHICH ARE ONLY EVERY 4 YEARS AND YOU HAVE WORKED YOUR ENTIRE LIFE TO COMPETE....DON'T TAKE CHANCES....SEEMS OBVIOUS. These athletes are so disciplined in every aspect of their lives...tremendous self control...how about a few weeks of abstinence.. That's 100% effective ...