Just another has- been trying to remain relevant
Just another has- been trying to remain relevant
Madona is the Al Sharpton of womankind. Man people are stupid,
xenonloper wrote:
exthrower wrote:Just curious...Is there ANYONE that Madonna hasn't had sex with?
jamin
Actually, she DID have sex with Jamin but was an unknowing participant as he masturbated to her nude pics in that book.
Madonna used to ride around the streets of Manhattan in her limousine and pick up young studs and have sex with them in the backseat. You can't get much sluttier than that.
Madonna makes dumb and irresponsible comments and later claims them as "metaphors" and "out of context". Same as Trump. Then both will blame the media instead of themselves. Lather, rinse, REPEAT. Not looking forward to the next 4-8 years.
pop_pop!_v2.2.1 wrote:
A10 fan wrote:Russia ???
To quote a reader's letter in my local newspaper this morning:
"Blaming the Russians for Hillary's defeat is the equivalent to blaming Watergate and Nixon's resignation on Deep Throat, Carl Bernstein and Bob Woodward"
That's not the point. The point is let's all have some facts regarding any kind of quid pro quo.
There is no way the blame should be shifted to "the Russians." The Dems did so much non-performing all the way down the ballot in November all on their own that Russians are way down the list of issues.
Certainly I agree with an investigation to get all the facts out.
But the discussion of whether the Russians are to blame or whether Hillary's poor campaign is to blame for her loss is very poorly conceptualized.
It like looking back on a football game where a team loses by 2 points and asking who is to blame, was it the missed field goal, was it the dropped TD pass,or was it the poor pass defense that let the other team score.
The answer of course is that it is all of those things together caused a lost game. Its the same thing with Hillary's loss. A number of factors together were involved in Hillary's loss. The Russians were certainly one of those factors.
So tell me, libturds. What did those evil Russians actually do?
pop_pop!_v2.2.1 wrote:
let's all have some facts regarding any kind of quid pro quo.
Look for facts to follow up on what evidence? There is no evidence. You don't investigate based on someone's wild, unsubstantiated accusations.
Let's have some facts regarding any kind of flying saucers.
she is an idiot, has been, they don't call he Mad Donna for nothing.
I don't buy the Russian excuse for Clinton losing. Who is saying "if it wasn't for those damned Russians, I'd have voted for Clinton!" Wikileaks simply confirmed to Clinton haters what they already suspected, and Clinton lovers simply didn't care.
This is wearisome. You are typical Trumpster, who as his crazy leader does, respond with an simplistic verbal put down.Whatever I will tell you you will never believe the Russians were a factor, nor will you believe, despite pictures taken at the same time relative to speech, that Trump's crowd was much smaller than Obama's.I could explain that the Russians hacked and published only one candidate's email to embarrass them and putting them at a disadvantage. I could say the Russians planted false stories. Our intelligence agencies have told us these things.But you will never believe. Your response is the simplistic,"....libs are mentally ill" and it will never change.
libs are mentally ill wrote:
So tell me, libturds. What did those evil Russians actually do?
It Would Take Three Hours wrote:
First of all, OP, Tea Partyers said all kinds of incendiary things, even making death threats. I'd like to see how many were ever investigated seriously.
You actually think Madonna is a threat to commit violence (except maybe to her sex partners)? Sure, okay, go ahead and spend money and time to "investigate" her. That's be really smart and useful.
Source and data supporting that, particularly the death threats??
well....... wrote:
Whatever I will tell you you will never believe the Russians were a factor
Nobody will - you have no evidence.
Our intelligence agencies have told us these things.
which is, in fact, evidence to the contrary.
Presumably you're one of the many posers who imagine themselves left wing, having trouble dealing with the collapse of your fantasy world and the sudden realization that the real left hates you.
full on press by rwnjs - they don't like madonna or any women because they never get any
well....... wrote: I could say the Russians planted false stories. Our intelligence agencies have told us these things.
Trump had every media outlet except Fox vehemently against him 24/7, but ya it was false stories planted by the Russians that swung the election.
Rufus Jefferson wrote:
Madonna used to ride around the streets of Manhattan in her limousine and pick up young studs and have sex with them in the backseat. You can't get much sluttier than that.
I'm surprised at all the comments about what a slut Madonna is. She's famous and she likes sex. Who cares? Fvcking puritans.
Sick Guy wrote:
I'm surprised at all the comments about what a slut Madonna is. She's famous and she likes sex. Who cares? Fvcking puritans.
So, she fvcks puritans? Or puritans care because they fvck? What does the fvcking of puritans have to do with it?
Sick Guy wrote:
Rufus Jefferson wrote:Madonna used to ride around the streets of Manhattan in her limousine and pick up young studs and have sex with them in the backseat. You can't get much sluttier than that.
I'm surprised at all the comments about what a slut Madonna is. She's famous and she likes sex. Who cares? Fvcking puritans.
The woman has made a career of portraying herself on stage as a cartoonish sex object. That hardly squares with the point of Saturday's march in DC.
I thought Madonna is British subject. Hasn't she been affecting a phony English accent for the last several years? She is pure trash. When Dennis Rodman threw her overboard that is all one needed to know.
Was Bill Clinton the only one who took her up on the BJ's for Hillary proposition?