British 3.39 1500 runner failed doping test in Belgium and UKA covered it up

Legit or not there have been some very suspicious performances from various brits this year, and don't give me this olympic year crap!

That British girl who improved a minute over 10k being one. Don't forget they had Jama Aden employed as an unofficial advisor.

MDrunnerknowsthetruth wrote:

A well known domestic British middle distance runner failed a anti doping test for a substance very similar to thyroxin found in a rare inhaler. UKA intervened and declared it not worth mentioning. The runner has now been expelled from his training group...... just another instance of UK Athletics and their dodgy practices. The runner has improved and ran a personal best of 3.39 this year and has domestic medals.

Here's part of the real story today:

This is potentially huge. Opening poster - I have some experience in these sort of cases and am very willing to offer my help. I am based in the US but is there an email address I can reach you on?

britsdontdope wrote:

Legit or not there have been some very suspicious performances from various brits this year, and don't give me this olympic year crap!

That British girl who improved a minute over 10k being one. Don't forget they had Jama Aden employed as an unofficial advisor.

The 32 minute girl? Would you even bat an eyelid if a Kenyan 10k runner dropped from 33 flat to 32 flat?

This guy is actually getting less suspicious to me. Is 3:44 as a 19 year old and then 3:39 as a 20 year old a crazy progression? Unless he's gone 'full Kenya' and he's actually 26.

brits wrote:

UKA also did not follow up leads about a british doping doctor. The rise of british cyclists to the absolute top is very suspecious as well.

BC is supposed to simultaneously run a strict anti-doping program and field a team that suddenly dominates a dirty sport?

USA Cycling did exactly this with the usps team and we know how clean that program was.

Put up or shut up.

Pop_pop!_v2.2.1 wrote:

brits wrote:

UKA also did not follow up leads about a british doping doctor. The rise of british cyclists to the absolute top is very suspecious as well.

BC is supposed to simultaneously run a strict anti-doping program and field a team that suddenly dominates a dirty sport?

USA Cycling did exactly this with the usps team and we know how clean that program was.

They're doing a very good job though. It's been the best part of a decade now and no real issues and not even a rumour besides 'you're fast so you must be doping'.

If you're talking about the track program too, they basically took a relatively weak sport and ploughed their best talent into it. Essentially, if a Wiggins, Thomas or Armistead came along for any other nation, they would be straight onto the road. Not for Team GB.

If you're talking Team SKY, that's just buying up the best riders, and they're not particularly dominant in the grand scheme of things.

Is there any way the brojos can get in touch with this dude that started the thread and maybe find out some deets to then take it to the appropriate third parties to begin a thorough investigation into potential state sponsored doping in British sport?

Offering help wrote:

This is potentially huge. Opening poster - I have some experience in these sort of cases and am very willing to offer my help. I am based in the US but is there an email address I can reach you on?

What kind of help can an American offer a situation that's perfectly within the rules and happened in Britain?

Beware Internet strangers offering help.

Let's all remind ourselves what IOC sports do to whistleblowers. How are those Rusians doing? Rene Anne Shirley? The list is too long.

trollism wrote:

If you're talking Team SKY, that's just buying up the best riders, and they're not particularly dominant in the grand scheme of things.

Chris froome suddenly became a good cyclist after they bought him

There's the hiring of geert leinders ,the ex rabobank doping doctor

No easy way to explain that innocently

MDrunnerknowsthetruth wrote:

A well known domestic British middle distance runner failed a anti doping test for a substance very similar to thyroxin found in a rare inhaler. UKA intervened and declared it not worth mentioning. The runner has now been expelled from his training group...... just another instance of UK Athletics and their dodgy practices. The runner has improved and ran a personal best of 3.39 this year and has domestic medals.

Name them!! You cannot incriminate 3 innocent athletes to protect one scumbag. Cook, Marshall, Fitzgibbon or Gourley.

African violet wrote:

MDrunnerknowsthetruth wrote:

A well known domestic British middle distance runner failed a anti doping test for a substance very similar to thyroxin found in a rare inhaler. UKA intervened and declared it not worth mentioning. The runner has now been expelled from his training group...... just another instance of UK Athletics and their dodgy practices. The runner has improved and ran a personal best of 3.39 this year and has domestic medals.

Name them!! You cannot incriminate 3 innocent athletes to protect one scumbag. Cook, Marshall, Fitzgibbon or Gourley.

Pretty clear by now who it is...

trackfan. wrote:

trollism wrote:

If you're talking Team SKY, that's just buying up the best riders, and they're not particularly dominant in the grand scheme of things.

Chris froome suddenly became a good cyclist after they bought him

There's the hiring of geert leinders ,the ex rabobank doping doctor

No easy way to explain that innocently

So if turning mediocre cyclists into world beaters is their thing, why do they bother with signing guys like Kwiatkowski, Poels and Landa? Why don't they just sign mediocre guys and get them to win the TDF?

Or do they spend their whole drug budget on Froome?

African violet wrote:

MDrunnerknowsthetruth wrote:

A well known domestic British middle distance runner failed a anti doping test for a substance very similar to thyroxin found in a rare inhaler. UKA intervened and declared it not worth mentioning. The runner has now been expelled from his training group...... just another instance of UK Athletics and their dodgy practices. The runner has improved and ran a personal best of 3.39 this year and has domestic medals.

Name them!! You cannot incriminate 3 innocent athletes to protect one scumbag. Cook, Marshall, Fitzgibbon or Gourley.

Marshal coached by James Thie according to the uk rankings website. ran against Thie a few times when he came over here and always seemed a good guy, would be surprised if he made his athletes dope.

Godwin wrote:

African violet wrote:

Name them!! You cannot incriminate 3 innocent athletes to protect one scumbag. Cook, Marshall, Fitzgibbon or Gourley.

Pretty clear by now who it is...

Who?

Also could be someone from previous years, e.g Cameron Boyek, who ran 3:39 at Belgium last year.

There's not really a drug program at Team Sky. They get skinny with thyroxine and the rest is hidden motors.

Froome will not win the TdF this year because there will be a bunch of people using thermal cameras. The Tour will be won by a guy doing it the old fashioned way, dropping bags on rest days.

MDrunnerknowsthetruth wrote:

A well known domestic British middle distance runner failed a anti doping test for a substance very similar to thyroxin found in a rare inhaler. UKA intervened and declared it not worth mentioning. The runner has now been expelled from his training group...... just another instance of UK Athletics and their dodgy practices. The runner has improved and ran a personal best of 3.39 this year and has domestic medals.

Opening poster reveal yourself and your proof. You now have a duty to the clean athletes that have been dragged into this as well as to your sport. From your silence and the other posts I can only assume it is Fitsgibbon. Begging the question is Charlie Grice dirty too?

A 3:39 1500???

LOL!

That's what a typical Kenyan boy runs to get to the school's rest room.