Lyfter wrote:
I'm sure you've seen this, since every major publication picked it up today.
Yes, this is really true. High intensity training like running up stadium stairs is as effective as 45 min of endurance running.
The additional benefit is that you will not overuse your joints and will not get arthritis at young age.
What if your race is longer than 60s and not up stairs?
Or what if it is up stairs?
Xfit_Idiot_the_Fake_One wrote:
If you want to remain scrawny fat, you can stick to your 45min jogging.
But if you want to be ripped, HIIT is the superior exericse.
And don't forget to eat a lot of red meat and pump iron.
Or you could sit at your desk and take GW1516, AICAR, Clen and Thyroid and get superfitripped.
used to be old and in the way wrote:
complementary in terms of optimizing adaptive signaling and technical mastery at an acceptable level of stress.
Is that you J O ?
boring:http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21451146http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27014087http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25539479
used to be old and in the way wrote:
Results are not interesting - because just as every other study that studied HIT, they started with couch potatoes.
Results will vary, if you are already working out..
For potatoes, any exercise stimulus will work.
For athletes, the stimulus has to be changed occasionally. When and how, now that's the $65 question..
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20861519Q: What is best practice for training intensity and duration distribution in endurance athletes?
A: (after a meta-analysis of successful athletes in several different endurance sports)
The predominance of low-intensity, long-duration training, in combination with fewer, highly intensive bouts may be complementary in terms of optimizing adaptive signaling and technical mastery at an acceptable level of stress.
I've run stadium stairs for 45 minutes.
Lyfter wrote:
I'm sure you've seen this, since every major publication picked it up today.
Yes, this is really true. High intensity training like running up stadium stairs is as effective as 45 min of endurance running.
The additional benefit is that you will not overuse your joints and will not get arthritis at young age.
Why don't the world's best just do a 60s sprint and call it a day?
txRUNNERgirl wrote:
I've run stadium stairs for 45 minutes.
I've run 4 times 15 stories as a sprinter.
Dedicated to the memory of J. O.
Wikipedia:
"Firing frequency is defined as the number of neuronal signals sent per second on one motoneuron. This frequency is measured in Hertz. Maximum firing frequency in humans typically ranges from 100–200 Hz. Studies incorporating electromyography have proven that adaptation mechanisms occurring as a result of resistance training have can drastically increase the maximal firing frequency of a motoneuron. Firing frequency has been shown to increase by as much as 40 percent in professional athletes as a result of resistance training.[2] Increases in firing frequency improve athletic force by decreasing the time to maximum muscle contraction (also known as reaction time) rather than increasing the maximum force output."
Trump speaks at a 4th grade level. He had entrapped millions of Americans.
Apparently this guy has also done that!!!
Wake up morons!
That's your IQ buddy... wrote:
Trump speaks at a 4th grade level. He had entrapped millions of Americans.
Apparently this guy has also done that!!!
Wake up morons!
You misspelled morans
Fred. Good work on your spelling. Let's try reading comprehension of the front page at Letsrun.com. Here is a headline from the front page. Tell me if you find anything wrong with a sentence from the front page:Good Read: Teleconference Highlights Catching Up With Christian Taylor Taylor is in a training group that includes 200m world champ Dafne Schippers and he admits to making sure he runs faster than in her out of pride.Do you see anything wrong with the last sentence?This sentence is still on the front page.Did you miss it? Go check the front page.You always have to see it to believe it at Letsrun.com
fred wrote:
That's your IQ buddy... wrote:Trump speaks at a 4th grade level. He had entrapped millions of Americans.
Apparently this guy has also done that!!!
Wake up morons!
You misspelled morans
So if I run 45 minutes does it negate the 60 seconds of stadium stairs I did beforehand? Do I get the benefit back by doing the stairs again afterwards? So many questions....
No reduction of benefit of the original 60 seconds of stairs. There could even be synergism with the stairs and 45 minute run.
By the way...I am entering people in a clinical trial of a new experimental drug designed just for people like you.
Here are some entry questions for the clinical trial:
1) Have you ever been a member of a professional cycling team?
2) Is your name Fred?
You can submit your answers at the Autism Spectrum Disorder (NOS) thread and we will let you know if you qualify. I have a pretty good feeling that you will probably qualify for the trial.
I hope you do better with your answers than Fred did with his answers.
The good news is that Fred did finally qualify for the clinical trial.
How about this ..
Here's a news flash.
Distance running is destructive to the human body.
Sprints under 100 meters are better.
Distance running prohibits protein synthesis within the muscle fibers thus causing them to become weaker and smaller due to the stresss.
And if your comeback to this is that distance runners lungs are stronger. Then guess what? You're wrong again.
The only reason why it appears that a distance runners lungs are stronger is because of the fact that most distance runners have destroyed basically all muscle tone in their body thus reducing their overall mass.
It's not hard to move through the earth when you're only 105 lbs. It's basic physics. It has nothing to do with your lungs being superior or anything.
A sprinters lungs are a billion times stronger than any distance runners lungs because they look like what they are suppose to look like.
Distance running is like some kind of disease that people get addicted to and it literally destroys their bodies from the inside out.
It makes even their lungs weaker. Think about it. If you're making your body weaker overall by doing distance running and you're stressing out your body and your mind repeatedly for no reason then what makes you think that your lungs are not also becoming weaker?
Just because there are two points on earth A and B, doesn't mean that the human body was ever designed to run it.
And if anyone brings up some crap about well early humans needed to run far then you're wrong again.
Because if you didn't have any type of elemental escapability to start then it doesn't matter how far you think you can run.
Is it Jon Orange?
track400meters1 wrote:
How about this ..
Here's a news flash.
Distance running is destructive to the human body.
Sprints under 100 meters are better.
Distance running prohibits protein synthesis within the muscle fibers thus causing them to become weaker and smaller due to the stresss.
And if your comeback to this is that distance runners lungs are stronger. Then guess what? You're wrong again.
The only reason why it appears that a distance runners lungs are stronger is because of the fact that most distance runners have destroyed basically all muscle tone in their body thus reducing their overall mass.
It's not hard to move through the earth when you're only 105 lbs. It's basic physics. It has nothing to do with your lungs being superior or anything.
A sprinters lungs are a billion times stronger than any distance runners lungs because they look like what they are suppose to look like.
Distance running is like some kind of disease that people get addicted to and it literally destroys their bodies from the inside out.
It makes even their lungs weaker. Think about it. If you're making your body weaker overall by doing distance running and you're stressing out your body and your mind repeatedly for no reason then what makes you think that your lungs are not also becoming weaker?
Just because there are two points on earth A and B, doesn't mean that the human body was ever designed to run it.
And if anyone brings up some crap about well early humans needed to run far then you're wrong again.
Because if you didn't have any type of elemental escapability to start then it doesn't matter how far you think you can run.
lol
AlSal will be happy to get this news. He can have the NOP long distance runners just do some sort of vigorous work for 1 minute a day instead of running 100 mi/wk. More time for ice baths and watching soccer on TV. New PBs will certainly come soon.
[quote]Lyfter wrote:
I'm sure you've seen this, since every major publication picked it up today.
Yes, this is really true. High intensity training like running up stadium stairs is as effective as 45 min of endurance running.'
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
So Mo can stop doing 100m + per week and just run a few stairs every day
Lyfter wrote:
Seriously mate? wrote:As effective doing what exactly? So if I do 2-3 minutes of stairs a day that should be equivalent to about 100 miles a week running? Should be able to smash all my PR's this coming year!
Well, 100 mpw isn't good for your health. So yes, 1 or 3 min of high intense exercise is both superior to 100mpw.
LOL. Just keep doing that, and I'll do my 100 mow and we'll see 1 year later who's FASTER - that's the only form of superior that matters.
For the record, I also work stairs into that weekly 100 mow. Just not more than once a week, anything more is going to wear you out and make you SLOWER. Amateur.