You missed the point. The point wasn't that the training for said sports was so good that their athletes would all be ready to run their best, the point was that there were a lot of people who just happened to be vastly superior athletes who chose to play baseball, basketball, and football. My team grabbed the kid who ended up setting the school home course record in XC off of the bench of the basketball team in 10th grade, after he ran a 4:39 in gym class. He wasn't a good basketball player, but he was a good athlete, and he wanted to play basketball, not run. He ended up being the #1 man on an ok DIII team in college (25:00 8K in XC, 30:50 10K on the track). It wasn't that basketball training was so good that all of the basketball players could beat all of the runners, it was that for the most part, the track team was composed of all of the rejects from the other sports, like me, who weren't athletic enough to do anything else. Decent athletes, like him, who could put one foot in front of the other without tripping and falling down, wanted to play basketball.
dukerdog wrote:
BCT wrote:but I bet a couple guys on each of all of the other teams, except maybe bowling and archery, could have at least given me a stern challenge, if not beat me, with little to no training outside of what they did for basketball, soccer, or whatever.
A couple guys on each team could run close to 4:36 without training for it? Not a chance. Maybe one or two guys from soccer or lacrosse, but none of the other sports. What kind of training do you think these guys do for football, basketball, or baseball? Nothing that's going to help them much in a mile race, that's for sure.