So Wejo, Did you talk to Paula

Many of us will understand if you can't or won't comment on your conversation. Perhaps you could just let us know if you still think she was drug free?

The Nike Androgen Project wrote:

Many of us will understand if you can't or won't comment on your conversation. Perhaps you could just let us know if you still think she was drug free?

I went running with Paula while in China.

I'm still recovering. I think it was the only time in my life while out for an easy run in a park, I told the person I was running with to do another lap without me. (Of course she conned me into doing another lap). Then I told her I needed to stop and buy some water.

Pacing her in Chicago was easier.

I'll post more tomorrow or over the weekend, but yes i think she was drug free. Prior to the run I must say I was very skeptical for the first time in my life. The gun to the head test is what Robert and I always use on whether someone is dirty or clean. I put a gun to your head and there is some truth detector that pulls the trigger if you're wrong. Do you think the person is clean or dirty?

It's a super easy decision for me now - clean. A day or two before, Robert asked me and I tried not answering.

Dopers tend to look good at the end of a race. Paula looked like she had more heart than anyone else. Mo is another one i would put on that list.

Wejo, did you have your Rick Reilly moment with Paula?

wejo wrote:

The Nike Androgen Project wrote:

Many of us will understand if you can't or won't comment on your conversation. Perhaps you could just let us know if you still think she was drug free?

I went running with Paula while in China.

I'll post more tomorrow or over the weekend

It's a super easy decision for me now - clean.

I certainly hope you'll post more information than this. Like what discussions you had about her OFF-hr scores and how Michael Ashenden WHO DESIGNED THE OFF-HR SCORE (co author on the paper I posted the link to the other day!) thinks it can't be explained by natural processes.

wejo wrote:

Pacing her in Chicago was easier.

It's a super easy decision for me now - clean. A day or two before, Robert asked me and I tried not answering.

I certainly hope you didn't come to that decision because you got out of shape and she kicked your butt in an easy workout because that's what your post reads like.

Wejo,

Great, this must mean Paula will be releasing her blood values since she convinced you she was clean.

Surely if you’ve come away feeling supremeley confident she’s innocent then it’s one of the following

1 : You spoke to her and she told you it’s not her that has got the super injunction and being talked about, and she has no unusual blood values

2: She said it is her but explained the reasons why her blood was high and you agree that the explanation is fine and okay she’s clean

3: You didn’t bring it up directly

4: She just said directly to you she didn’t cheat and you believe her because she’s a friend not because of any evidence

If its 1 or 2 then she needs to come out and say so and show the evidence. If it’s that good, to make it a “super easy decision” then it should at least placate a lot of us suspicious more about the attempt at secrecy .

If its 3 or 4 then you have shown unbelievable bias on how you treat suspected athletes.

I hope your right but beginning to feel duped

I have to say if you are so easily convinced and you are sure she is clean she must have a good explanation. And if indeed this is the case, why doesn't she present this information to everyone involved. Obviously if this information is so strong she would want some of these doping authorities to have this same info to change their opinion.

I certainly hope you provide this information, Salazar provided information for everyone and yet you still feel he is guilty. Although I feel he definitely skirts the boundries of ethical behavior at least he is willing to offer some insight versus Paula doing the duck and cover maneuver.

Bill Murray wrote:

Salazar provided information for everyone

I guess you mean he provided information showing he was squirting Androgel on athletes. Doesn't sound very clean to me.

End of race. wrote:

Dopers tend to look good at the end of a race. Paula looked like she had more heart than anyone else. Mo is another one i would put on that list.

You need to tell WADA about this great way to find drug cheats, I gotta believe its reliability must be easily over 90% and even when its wrong, well, they looked good at the end of a race so they must not have been trying and deserved to get busted anyway. It can even be named the "Pre" test, that should add credibility.

BS wrote:

It can even be named the "Pre" test, that should add credibility.

Placing better than 4th would also be proof of doping.

Mo usually looks doped before the start of a major race

It was noticeable in Beijing, he seemed to be elated before the final started,not normal at all

Some type of stimulant presumably

coach... wrote:

Mo usually looks doped before the start of a major race

It was noticeable in Beijing, he seemed to be elated before the final started,not normal at all

Some type of stimulant presumably

Khat.

On another subject, I had textual relations with Hilary Clinton last week and I've never been more sure that her email server was above board.

Bill Murray wrote:

I certainly hope you provide this information, Salazar provided information for everyone and yet you still feel he is guilty. Although I feel he definitely skirts the boundries of ethical behavior at least he is willing to offer some insight versus Paula doing the duck and cover maneuver.

Where has weldon said he feels Salazar is guilty?

wejo wrote:

Prior to the run I must say I was very skeptical for the first time in my life.The gun to the head test is what Robert and I always use on whether someone is dirty or clean. I put a gun to your head and there is some truth detector that pulls the trigger if you're wrong. Do you think the person is clean or dirty?

It's a super easy decision for me now - clean.

You've convinced me and it's a super easy decision -

Radcliffe is dirty.

I find it hard to even believe you posted that response. But here goes:

Salazar countdown clock waiting for his answer to doping claims.

Banner at the top of the page (only recently removed) entitled NOP doping scandal updates

Etc., Etc., I can continue if you would like.

Bill Murray wrote:

I find it hard to even believe you posted that response. But here goes:

Salazar countdown clock waiting for his answer to doping claims.

Banner at the top of the page (only recently removed) entitled NOP doping scandal updates

Etc., Etc., I can continue if you would like.

What you are failing to realize is the Wejo never literally said that he feels Salazar is guilty. Since he didn't literally say it, he never said it.

First and foremost, I honestly always read Wejo's comments during the NOP ordeal as least biased. I assumed Rojo was the one leading the anti-NOP bandwagon around here. :)

Secondly, what the hell is wrong with you people?! As mentioned, Wejo made 0 attempt to explain why he feels as he does. Not to mention how pathetic it is that we all assume we know Paula is dirty without knowing her. Weldon has obviously had a real life conversation with her, which grants him insight that none of us have.

I know you cynical d*cks are going to make some stupid sarcastic comments about how no one lies to someone they run with, but for God's sake try to comprehend faith in another human being. I respect Wejo for his feelings and for his faith in her, regardless of the reasoning. He even admitted he needed some reinforcement prior to the WC and he got it. If that reinforcement was simply Paula looking at him and saying "I didn't cheat," more power to him. Do you think Justin Gatlin's mother believes he cheated? (assuming she doesn't know he did)