Bolt's 9.58

Bolt doesn't need roids to sprint anymore than Pavarotti needed roids to sing or Baryshnikov needed roids to dance

It's not going to get through my head, because our definition of evidence is different.

Your statement that there was substantial evidence and testimony about Bonds, Armstrong, Marion Jones from the very beginning is blatantly false. The Balco raid did in Jones and Bonds. Armstrong's story would likely be very different if he hadn't come out of retirement.

There's been the same amount of speculation and conjecture about Bolt as there was about Bonds and Armstrong. In my opinion, the only question is when Bolt's version of the Balco raid is coming.

Your point about some athletes needing drugs and others not, including your examples of Nadia Comaneci and Barry Sanders, is meaningless.

dsfdsf wrote:

It's not going to get through my head, because our definition of evidence is different.

Your statement that there was substantial evidence and testimony about Bonds, Armstrong, Marion Jones from the very beginning is blatantly false. The Balco raid did in Jones and Bonds. Armstrong's story would likely be very different if he hadn't come out of retirement.

There's been the same amount of speculation and conjecture about Bolt as there was about Bonds and Armstrong. In my opinion, the only question is when Bolt's version of the Balco raid is coming.

Your point about some athletes needing drugs and others not, including your examples of Nadia Comaneci and Barry Sanders, is meaningless.

Ignore Loot.

He doesn't believe in the evidence for evolution being true either.

When did Bolt start taking drugs?

100m

2007 - 10.03, +0.7

2008 - 9.69, 0.0

200m

2007 - 19.75, +0.2

2008 - 19.30, -0.9

See progression here:

http://www.iaaf.org/athletes/jamaica/usain-bolt-184599#progression

There hasn't been ANY speculation, conjecture about Bolt. ANYWHERE, except from a handful of morons who like you who want to rationalize your own drug use by accusing everyone else of using drugs

The point about Sanders and Comaneci is meaningful because it is example of athletes that achieve inhuman results without use of drugs... like Bolt has done

Another evolutard! Do you morons ever realize what fools you make of yourselves?

In case you missed it, there is no evidence of "evolution"

If you read what I posted, I said that he EVENTUALLY improved the old WR of 9.74 to 9.58. Doesn't matter that he improved it incrementally, it was his throughout.

He was always f*cking fast wrote:

I don't think Bolt is a cheater. The guy ran a 19.93 as an 18 year old! Is it that hard to believe someone with that kind of talent could run world records after a few more years of growth and serious training? He's clearly a freak of nature and that's that.

You have many Kenyans/Ethiopians running great times at 18 years old, and then they don't improve their PB's.

TrackCoach wrote:

wtfunny wrote:

Isn't it just as fantastic to presume he's doping because he is so far ahead of the field? What drug do you suppose he's taking that changed him from a 10.03 sprinter to a 9.58 guy, a guy who is faster than all the guys (doping) behind him by such a staggering amount?

These guys are clearly thinking they'll do whatever they can to run faster .. so it's not like they're gunna pass up the heavy juice and just aim for the bronze medal. Yet you think Usain alone has found the magic juice that no other doper on the planet takes, and it bolsters his 100m time by nearly half a second?

Re: "Isn't it just as fantastic to presume he's doping because he is so far ahead of the field? " - Isn't that the exact same reason everyone 'presumes' FloJo was doping.

I think there's a lot more to it with FloJo. Primarily, her dramatic improvements at a time in her life when very few, if any, elite athletes, make much improvement at all. Secondly, the matching changes in her body that go right along with what we expect to see from steroid use.