subfive wrote:
gillyweed wrote:Throw 4 interceptions, get sacked 5 times, complete less than half of the pass attempts, have a QBR of 44. Sounds like a winner to me. Reality is that he had to rely on the defense, & Lynch, as well as the other team collapsing, once again.
Hello, he ran for the TD that put them ahead
He did? What game were you watching?
Hahaha. What an idiot.I watched the whole game- He ran for the TD that put them up by 21, essentially putting the game out of reach.
gillyweed wrote:
subfive wrote:Hello, he ran for the TD that put them ahead
He did? What game were you watching?
Pile it up wrote:
Wonder if Romo could have won with Seattle today?
Ha ha ha ha ha
Douchie Cowboy fans.
It always comes back to Dallas
Hahaha. What an idiot you are. I watched the whole game & he did not. Also, put the game out of reach? Packers put it in overtime. You're an absolute moron on every level.
Just another idiot wrote:
Hahaha. What an idiot.
I watched the whole game- He ran for the TD that put them up by 21, essentially putting the game out of reach.
gillyweed wrote:He did? What game were you watching?
Just another idiot wrote:
Hahaha. What an idiot.
I watched the whole game- He ran for the TD that put them up by 21, essentially putting the game out of reach.
gillyweed wrote:He did? What game were you watching?
They were up by 21?
Say wha? wrote:
Just another idiot wrote:Hahaha. What an idiot.
I watched the whole game- He ran for the TD that put them up by 21, essentially putting the game out of reach.
They were up by 21?
haha & to add on to that . . .
Lynch (not Wilson) is the one who ran for the TD that put them ahead, but just another idiot & MeHereYouWhere, obviously didn't even watch the game.
Marshawn Lynch rushes 25 times for 157 yards, while Russell Wilson gets a 13.6 QBR and 44 rating with a fumble, four interceptions, and five sacks, and you're touting Wilson???
Congratulations to the Seahawks for being the first champ in ten years to get back to the Super Bowl the next year. I thought they'd win with Rogers injured and they came through in the end after an inept game prior to that.
It wouldn't have happened without Lynch.But it wouldn't have happened without Wilson either. It was the team as a whole getting it together in the final minutes of the fourth quarter. So it's really Seattle MF Seahawks.
jjjjjj wrote:
Marshawn Lynch rushes 25 times for 157 yards, while Russell Wilson gets a 13.6 QBR and 44 rating with a fumble, four interceptions, and five sacks, and you're touting Wilson???
Congratulations to the Seahawks for being the first champ in ten years to get back to the Super Bowl the next year. I thought they'd win with Rogers injured and they came through in the end after an inept game prior to that.
Did you even see the end of the game?
HawkEye wrote:
It wouldn't have happened without Lynch.But it wouldn't have happened without Wilson either. It was the team as a whole getting it together in the final minutes of the fourth quarter. So it's really Seattle MF Seahawks.
It wouldn't have needed to happen without Wilson! They would have already been ahead. How do you people not understand this.
HawkEye wrote:
But it wouldn't have happened without Wilson either. It was the team as a whole getting it together in the final minutes of the fourth quarter.
I'm fairly confident in saying that about 26 other QBs in the NFL could have played that game & played better than Wilson. I agree with your second point though, that it was the team.
Chattanooga wrote:
HawkEye wrote:But it wouldn't have happened without Wilson either. It was the team as a whole getting it together in the final minutes of the fourth quarter.
I'm fairly confident in saying that about 26 other QBs in the NFL could have played that game & played better than Wilson. I agree with your second point though, that it was the team.
There is no denying that Wilson played perhaps the crappiest first 3 1/2 quarters of his NFL career. But the Seahawks generally played poorly for most of the game - some of those picks were viable passes and the defense wasn't up to the usual standard. B
But I feel very confident saying that there are few QBs who could have delivered 3 touch downs in 5 minutes to win a championship game.
gillyweed wrote:
subfive wrote:Hello, he ran for the TD that put them ahead
He did? What game were you watching?
I watched that game while having some brandy. So I stand corrected, that was lynch who ran that TD. But Wilson did perform well in the end. And I admit he was terrible for most of the game.
GB did blow the lead. And Rodgers did throw 2 picks. SEA finished strong. They...the team won the title...end of story.
subfive wrote:
gillyweed wrote:He did? What game were you watching?
I watched that game while having some brandy. So I stand corrected, that was lynch who ran that TD. But Wilson did perform well in the end. And I admit he was terrible for most of the game.
GB did blow the lead. And Rodgers did throw 2 picks. SEA finished strong. They...the team won the title...end of story.
Good post. Kudos for admitting you were wrong. Most on here don't have the balls to do that.
I'd be crying two if I threw 4 picks.
Seattle just got lucky. That muffed on side kick and winning the coin toss in OT saved their asses. Don't even get me started on that 2 point conversion as well. If any one of those 3 things hadn't happened they would be going home. They don't deserve to be in the Super Bowl and I look forward to them getting their asses kicked.
Seattle fans are the worst wrote:
I'd be crying two if I threw 4 picks.
Seattle just got lucky. That muffed on side kick and winning the coin toss in OT saved their asses. Don't even get me started on that 2 point conversion as well. If any one of those 3 things hadn't happened they would be going home. They don't deserve to be in the Super Bowl and I look forward to them getting their asses kicked.
If we really want to get into it, neither team "deserved" to win today. It was a poorly played game filled with turnovers, penalties, and mistakes.
However, Seattle won. Everyone knew they were the better team going in. They made more of their mistakes early to give GB a chance at an upset but they couldn't execute in the red zone all day and choked the last 3 minutes.
Not sure why everyone is so up in arms, I told you last week once Dallas was out Seattle had already punched their ticket to Arizona and New England was going to dominate Indy. No surprises and nothing to see here.
Dial it up wrote:
his usual narcissistic nonsense
Seriously dude - do you ever post anything that is not both stupid and self-congratulatory? You are definitely making a big push for the #1 narcissist here on LRC. With just a little more effort you might be able to overtake that "financial wizard" libtard.
Russell Wilson has never lost a game against a Super Bowl winning Quarterback.He is 1-0 against Brady.
Even giving credit for the big plays late in the game, and arguing that 2 interceptions were good throws that Kearse should have caught, anyone would have to admit he played poorly today.
That said, just as last week's performance by itself didn't make him great, tonight's performance by itself doesn't make him awful. My hunch is that he still has an incredible playoff QBR.
Passes that bounce off a receiver's hands and into the hands of a defensive player should be categorized as something other than "interceptions" blamed on the QB.