I eat 3 eggs a day....is this bad??

fan of US distance running wrote:

hahahahahahahahahahaha

well look at that. So you basically admit that I was right all along, and that you and "me" (get used to it) are the same poster

So you've exposed yourself AGAIN as a lying sack of $hit and hypocrite, who cowardly changes names every chance "he" gets. . And I had you nailed on this all along. Awesome, thanks for proving me right! Just more proof on what a pathetic loser you are.

fan of US distance running wrote:

hahahahahahahahahahaha

Dear "Get Used To It,"

STOP using my name. I don't know why you think this is funny. I've asked to cut the $hit with this several times, but you keep doing this.

Oh, wait, we're the same guy. Carry on.

Educate yourself about the true health detriments of eggs (and other animal sources of food).

http://nutritionfacts.org/topics/eggs/

Get used to it.. wrote:

You just can't change what you said and say I lose, you dingbat. Accept it...you are a fraud and have been exposed. Night sweetheart!

Nope. You corrected me on ONE thing. Every other thing I wrote about eggs, their nutritional value, and their impact on cholesterol levels was 100% correct. So yes, you absolutely "lose" when you say that I "don't know what it's an egg." Like I said, instead of saying "eggs are fairly high in pufa's (POLY unsat fatty acids), it would have more accurate to have said Ufa's (unsat fatty acids, which include PUFAs and MUFAs, obviously, and which, as I said, can both have positive impacts on cholesterol levels, contrary to the negative impact of SFA).

And guess what? Many eggs now ARE quite high in Omega 3 PUFA's. Yup, some up to almost 700 mg in a single egg. 2 would give you 1300+ mg, and that is CERTAINLY a good source of omega 3 PUFA's

This is awesome. The one thing you kinda sorta corrected me on a little, was actually pretty accurate to begin with concerning the new "breed" of high Omega 3 eggs that they are producing. LOVE........IT.

(and you might want to cut out the "goodnight sexy" or "sweetheart" sign offs. Your boyfriend knows how unfaithful you gays are, and might think that you could be cheating on him. Or maybe he doesn't care. )

You will most likely start growing a few feathers, but other than that, you'll be fine.

fan of US distance running wrote:

fan of US distance running wrote:

hahahahahahahahahahaha

Dear "Get Used To It,"

STOP using my name. I don't know why you think this is funny. I've asked to cut the $hit with this several times, but you keep doing this.

Oh, wait, we're the same guy. Carry on.

Both of the above posts were made by Tyrannosaurus Rexing

Tyrannosaurus Rexing posing as get used to it. wrote:

well look at that. So you basically admit that I was right all along, and that you and "me" (get used to it) are the same poster

What the hell are you talking about?

Tyrannosaurus Rexing posing as get used to it. wrote:

So you've exposed yourself AGAIN as a lying sack of $hit and hypocrite, who cowardly changes names every chance "he" gets.

The irony.

Tyrannosaurus Rexing posing as get used to it. wrote:

And I had you nailed on this all along. Awesome, thanks for proving me right! Just more proof on what a pathetic loser you are.

As stated before, I post under one name. Unlike you.

Tyrannosaurus Rexing posing as get used to it. wrote:

well look at that. So you basically admit that I was right all along, and that you and "me" (get used to it) are the same poster

I think I've actually figured out your idiotic line of reasoning.

You think because I replied in the same thread as 'get used to it.' that I was actually him but "forgot" to change my name back in the username field.

Umm, did it occur to you that we both frequently read the forums? And that posting in the same thread calling you out is quite likely?

No, of course that didn't occur to you. You're the same person that calling anyone who disagrees with your politics a racist redneck. Making unjustified assumptions is your M.O.

Now, let's see if you:

"CAN admit an error when I actually make an error"

I won't hold my breath.

You just don't get it. Had you just said what you said without the introductory tirade about who people should listen to I would not have said squat. But you continue to have the ego you are THE guy for nutrition. When you do this and fvck up you get crap. You have just shown you are not THE guy. And the funny thing is, you then have the audacity to tell me I lose. I mean...This $hit gets funnier and funnier baby doll.

I like cheese and pie.

Get used to it.. wrote:

You just don't get it. Had you just said what you said without the introductory tirade about who people should listen to I would not have said squat. But you continue to have the ego you are THE guy for nutrition. When you do this and fvck up you get crap. You have just shown you are not THE guy.

no, YOU don't get it.

a) you would have opened your fat trap no matter what I said ( because for

some strange reason you've convinced yourself you know what you are talking about when it comes to nutrition, you've to tell us WHY? that is), AND you don't like me (because I have the "audacity" to correct idiots who know nothing about the topic while I have an advanced degree in said topic, have work experience, and yes, have read 100x more papers than these people. Yes, how dare I! [furthermore I also apparently have the "audacity" to defend black people against the out and out and over the top racism that regularly spews from yours and others mouths on here. Again, how dare I! )

b) I never said I was "THE guy for nutrition" on this site. However, I've seen very few people on here (there are some) that seem to have a balanced view on the topic, or, seem to have an actual education on the topic. No, the people that chime in the most are either (mostly, like you), these fad diet, low carb, anti-grain, pro sat fat, pro paleo whackos, and the on the other end of the spectrum, the extreme vegans, who think that eating even the smallest amount of meat will kill you. Compared to these people, my view is MUCH more balanced, MUCH more nuanced, and MUCH more based on the scientific literature and my education. PERIOD. So yes, how DARE I think I know more than clowns like you that get much of your "education" from reading worth-$hit blogs written by nobodies pushing their own products and sites and books. Yes, the audacity of me.

The initial advice the young lady got, that dietary cholesterol has no impact on one's blood cholesterol levels no matter how much one eats or for any person is WRONG. So yes, I went on a "tirade" (spare me) to correct them. (And the other advice to read some asinine crap bestsellers on the topic was also useless. ). Again, how dare I.

And as I've already demonstrated TWICE for you, the small error I sort kinda made (on UFAs instead of PUFA's) in no way changes the overall impact of eggs on blood cholesterol, and furthermore, many eggs ARE good sources of the important omega 3 PUFAs, therefore making my initial comment even less incorrect.

So yes, you lose........yet again. (but like I said, you get a half point and half credit for your effort and for pointing out the higher Mufa than Pufa in eggs. Very good, you are paying attention. You might finally learn something after all).

The thread is hijacked, but I did get my cholesterol levels checked and they seem very good from what I've read... So that means I can continue what I'm doing?

Total=143

HDL=95

Organic eggs, or pastured eggs, are probably better. Taste better anyway.

And drop the sugar. Sugar is one of the most harmful 'foods' you can eat.

And NO hydrogenated oils.

Face it Pookie. Your long winded tirades don't cover your inadequacies. The good news is if you read recent literature you can continue to learn and maybe then you will be able to post on here with accurate information. Maybe even look at getting a tutor? Anyway Snugglebear, I hope you have a super day!

Get used to it.. wrote:

Face it Pookie. Your long winded tirades don't cover your inadequacies. The good news is if you read recent literature you can continue to learn and maybe then you will be able to post on here with accurate information. Maybe even look at getting a tutor? Anyway Snugglebear, I hope you have a super day!

"Face it Pookie" is not a sentence. It really is not. And calling me "pookie" or "snuggle bear" or "sexy" or "dearie" or "cutie" or whatever other pet-names you can come up with, really, REALY does not

a) hurt me feelings, or

b) advance whatever point you are trying to make.

How you could think otherwise, I can't imagine (but let me guess, you will continue doing so because you somehow imagined that it is effectively.....doing something. You are just like the "BUTTHURT/LIBTARD" guy. You are in GREAT company)

Egg eater wrote:

The thread is hijacked, but I did get my cholesterol levels checked and they seem very good from what I've read... So that means I can continue what I'm doing?

Total=143

HDL=95

You could be a troll (not the OP, who knows in this insane asylum), but I will answer anyway....

I apologize that I responded to the "hijackers." unfortunately this is the internet and one has deal with pseudo-experts, trolls, and childish immature posters that call you "dearie" as a debating point (and yes, some combine all of these, like my racist friend "get used to it"). I promise you I have the nutrition expertise that I claim, and they do not.

Anyway....

Yes, your HDL would be considered excellent, your total C is excellent, and it while it is strange that they did not test for LDL, however, one can calculate that it is very low.

But......

I would double check these numbers. Your LDL is unusually low, extremely low. Almost no one has a 2 to 1 HDL to LDL ratio as you claim.

And a high HDL isn't necessarily doing anything for you, however it is usually a marker for good health (exercise, healthy weight, moderate alcohol consumption tend to positive impacts on HDL). But again, it is not likely protective in itself.

But yes, if those really are your numbers, no need to change your diet. look for high omega 3 eggs, those will give you some good essential fats.

not a troll..and those are what they told me over the phone..

I researched it, and it did seem odd that my HDL would be higher than my LDL and by a lot.

She didn't test my LDL, because she said it was just to "check" and if my HDL looked good and relative to my total, then testing the LDL wouldn't be necessary.

I am questioning whether the test was accurate, I guess I could have them redone when I'm fasting and see what happens..I had eaten my normal three eggs, about six hours before they pulled my blood.

In the case it is accurate, than I shouldn't worry about eating my eggs :)

Thanks, have a good holiday!

OP

No

Honey...no one who claims expertise in nutrition would say that eggs are relatively high in PUFA's.