Glorified agent and drug denier.
Yum wrote:
I'll second the charge that Canova is an idiot. His "success" is nothing more than a a result of the fact that he's tapping the richest genetic talent pool on the planet.
Glorified agent and drug denier.
Yum wrote:
I'll second the charge that Canova is an idiot. His "success" is nothing more than a a result of the fact that he's tapping the richest genetic talent pool on the planet.
Those arms don't look like they are swinging their arms all that high to me?
Renato Canova wrote:
Don't try to explain with scientific reasons. The reason is very much more simple : running with higher arm swing is what happens for every runner, when climbing. The most part of Kenyans started running in very hilly areas, and automatically started to close th angle of their elbows, because their shoulders, running uphill, go ahead.
Forgive me, but I'm a logical guy. Do the hills in Kenya only go uphill? Seems like for most hilly runs, for every uphill there would be a downhill. So, for every time their shoulders, running uphill, go ahead, there would be a time when their shoulders, running downhill, go behind. Hill repeat workouts, sure, but "starting running in very hilly areas" doesn't quite add up.
Renato Canova wrote:
But it's out of discussion that an angle, at the elbow, between 80 and 100 grades is the best for Optimizing the performance.
I don't doubt what you claim here. You would certainly know more than me. But, is this solely on your experiences, or are there some studies you could share that have determined this un-discussable ideal 80-100 grade range?