Hardloper wrote:
According to Shannon they went out in 62-63, probably 62 for Jordan, guess I over-estimated that.
But yes, SMJO, maybe she should have considered running a 4-second PR. Brilliant.
I'm going by the info you gave. If she can't run 2:04 off base training and strides there is no hope for her on the world stage.
Well, Shalane won an Olympic medal at 10k
Kara won a world championship medal at 10k
Neither of them have come close to 2 flat for 800
Their 1500 PRs are 4:05
Just sayin!
I was talking about contending for the win. Shalane was so far back she wasn't even sure what place she was.
coachd. wrote:
You're a hobby jogger Xenonsreams.
She is not a hobbyjogger. But you are a total loser from Oregon.
The real coach d.
Any idea how many 400s they did after? 6? 10? just curious, thanks in advance
SMJO wrote:
Hardloper wrote:According to Shannon they went out in 62-63, probably 62 for Jordan, guess I over-estimated that.
But yes, SMJO, maybe she should have considered running a 4-second PR. Brilliant.
I'm going by the info you gave. If she can't run 2:04 off base training and strides there is no hope for her on the world stage.
I guess then you know the rest of the work she did this week leading up to this casual opener, her mileage for the week and her date pace goals, and her plan for the year?
Didn't think so.
PS: Xenon - thanks for your reporting, and of course hitting the Dempsey to support our sport.
It's an interesting venue to watch a indoor race from...inside of the track, eh?
Irrelevant and you don't know either. If you can knock off 62s after a crappy 800 you can run 2:04.
Explain how that(2:04) could possibly have anything but a fantastic benefit to someone like her with no speed.
Did you shower with them after the workout?
SMJO wrote:
Irrelevant and you don't know either. If you can knock off 62s after a crappy 800 you can run 2:04.
Explain how that(2:04) could possibly have anything but a fantastic benefit to someone like her with no speed.
She was doing a race, not a time trial. Perhaps you don't know the difference.
Yes, in a race you try to win. Perhaps you got the two mixed up?
says hi
Jordan looked ripped. Man, is that girl in shape or what? She's not a sprinter, she's a long distance gal. This only helps her in her development.
I was at the race today, Jordan is clearly in 10K shape and looked awesome. She cannot compete against these speedsters however. Likewise, they cannot compete against her in long distance. She rules the future of USA long distance running. Believe me.
Not at 5K/10K, history suggests you don't even need close to that.SMJO wrote:
Hardloper wrote:According to Shannon they went out in 62-63, probably 62 for Jordan, guess I over-estimated that.
But yes, SMJO, maybe she should have considered running a 4-second PR. Brilliant.
I'm going by the info you gave. If she can't run 2:04 off base training and strides there is no hope for her on the world stage.
We're not talking about history, we're talking about now.
SMJO wrote:
I was talking about contending for the win. Shalane was so far back she wasn't even sure what place she was.
You said no hope for her on the world STAGE you f'tard. Not the same as contending for the Olympic gold.
Silly me--I had always thought an Olympic Bronze in the 10000 was a great achievement. Now I know better. Thanks.
SMJO wrote:
I was talking about contending for the win. Shalane was so far back she wasn't even sure what place she was.
She is not a hobbyjogger. But you are a total loser from Oregon.
The real coach d.[/quote]
Xenonscreams is a hobby jogger. You do know her PR's right?!
Retardalert. wrote:
SMJO wrote:I was talking about contending for the win. Shalane was so far back she wasn't even sure what place she was.
You said no hope for her on the world STAGE you f'tard. Not the same as contending for the Olympic gold.
When I say the World stage, I mean contending. Your definition means just standing on the stage looking wide-eyed and out of your league.