lpd wrote:
There is no more a petty,jealous,insecure animal on the planet
than a white male.Can't accept others are simply superior to him.
All these accusations o drugs is just a pathetic excuse for white
men are mediocre physical and physiollogical specimens.
Reverse racism at it's finest.
Forget the racism, it's stupidity at its finest.
I have many times here said that all those guys who were doping were faster than me, even when clean--not to mention having said a million times that the best black sprinters are better than the best white sprinters.
The NewUncleB poster is a massive racist, always race-baiting. It's the only thing he knows how to do, and he sucks at even that, lol
rojo wrote:
Sprintgeezer wrote:Aries Merritt is an egregiously doping cheat. In my opinion.
Disgusting.
I won't even go over his 2012 season. One of the most disgusting, ever.
Here he is in 2013 backing into the final in 13.44 (-0.3), .05 behind the next-slowest qualifier.
I chafe when see his scumbag face on the track.
I hope he goes down in a heap in the final, he deserves it.
Did you watch the race? Have you seen the other thread? He had a .327 reaction time. He would have easily won that heat. I predict him for gold.
http://www.letsrun.com/forum/flat_read.php?thread=5340302As someone who doesn't care that much about sprint/hurdles. I like Merritt. He's certainly preferrable to me to Richardson because of Block.
Yeah good call Rojo - he defintely looked like the athlete who ran routine 12.9's last year then smashed a tough world record by 7/10ths of a second last year in that final we just watched...
this is about the most blantantly racist thing I have read on these message boards - can I ask why it is still here? Or are we still on the whole "only comments against black people made by white people are considered to be racist" trip? What a f$cking disgrace.
lpd wrote:
There is no more a petty,jealous,insecure animal on the planet
than a white male.Can't accept others are simply superior to him.
All these accusations o drugs is just a pathetic excuse for white
men are mediocre physical and physiollogical specimens.
Ricardo Stitchomoso wrote:Yeah good call Rojo - he defintely looked like the athlete who ran routine 12.9's last year then smashed a tough world record by 7/10ths of a second last year in that final we just watched...Merritt ran 12.17? Wow. Anyway, he was injured, it happens.
Bay Area wrote:
I am a little confused how somebody can be the "most egregious doper" on the track. I mean, it seems somewhat binary to me. Somebody either cheated, in which case they are a doper, or they didn't, in which case they aren't.
You seem to be suggesting he takes much higher doses than other dopers. It doesn't seem to me like that would make somebody a "more egregious doper" than others, just a willingness to accept a different level of risk than those who use less drugs.
I would like to see all drug cheats caught, regardless of whether they are more "egregious" than others or not. That being said, we can't assume somebody is doping just because they run a few tenths faster one year than others. All we can do is keep insisting the sport tests and does everything it can to catch any cheats and hopefully continue to tighten the noose and keep moving towards the (probably impossible to reach) ideal of it being impossible for anybody to cheat.
He's using the word "egregious" to try and make himself look intelligent.
He's failed.
Sprintgeezer is mentally ill.
You're an idiot. You come on here because it makes you feel like some kind of expert instead of staying on Sprintzone and Caribbean track where you got owned regularly, and you are largely negative, mainly with baseless accusations. I thought Vipam was bad, but you take the cake. BTW, I haven't seen VIPAN since you showed up, I wonder...
Salvator Stitchmo wrote:
this is about the most blantantly racist thing I have read on these message boards - can I ask why it is still here? Or are we still on the whole "only comments against black people made by white people are considered to be racist" trip? What a f$cking disgrace.
lpd wrote:There is no more a petty,jealous,insecure animal on the planet
than a white male.Can't accept others are simply superior to him.
All these accusations o drugs is just a pathetic excuse for white
men are mediocre physical and physiollogical specimens.
Please look up the definition of racism and then comment again. Thank you.
I have never posted on either of those fora, so you're barking up the wrong tree.
I must admit, Sprintgeezer, I like your posts and threads, agree with a lot of what you have to say, and think you always make things interesting.
However, in this case, I think you're wrong. There's a guy named youreanidiot who knows Aries Merritt and has seen him work out. Seen him, with his own 2 eyes! So obviously Merritt is clean.
...And then his kidneys failed. ROFLcopter!
What I don't find amusing is that he robbed his sister of a kidney and then continued his career, and is as good as ever, and may well rob someone else of a kidney later, someone who needs a transplant through no fault of their own.
He holds the WR - either he's on the PEDs and destroyed his kidneys, or PEDs don't work and Arnold Schwarzenegger was all placebo effect.
Sprintgeezer wrote:
I just don't want to see Merritt on the track at all.
Anybody would be preferable, because there is nobody in the 110mH who is as egregious a doper as he was in 2012 IMO.
Check out the "WR is gone 12.80" thread on letsrun, which is where I roast Merritt.
I can't stand the guy, I don't care if he is technically "clean" this year.
Rojo, yes, I saw the RT. I don't care how he performed, the time is really immaterial. Compare his 2013 season to his 2012 season, and then look at that "WR is gone 12.80" thread.
He is by far one of the most obvious dopers there is. Although he may not be using this year, once a doper, always a doper.
Second rant in the thread and not a word about his kidney transplant.
violasong wrote:
Second rant in the thread and not a word about his kidney transplant.
Check the dates.
Your 4th grade teacher wrote:
Salvator Stitchmo wrote:this is about the most blantantly racist thing I have read on these message boards - can I ask why it is still here? Or are we still on the whole "only comments against black people made by white people are considered to be racist" trip? What a f$cking disgrace.
Please look up the definition of racism and then comment again. Thank you.
Is it one of those definitions that says "Blacks can't be racist, as they are itn eh minority, and only whites can be racist cos they have the power?"
Which makes 90% of Africans racist. 99% of the Jamaicans. etc etc etc
So here in the US of A, if only 50% are racist, we're doing pretty well. Thanks