So the false flag in in effect... Whats the end result? We aren't going to war with Russia anytime soon?
What was the point of the bombing by our government then?
So the false flag in in effect... Whats the end result? We aren't going to war with Russia anytime soon?
What was the point of the bombing by our government then?
Continued vilification of Muslims to re-enforce support for the Likkud agenda in the middle east -- next steps regime change in Syria and Iran
Floyd the Barber wrote:
Dealwithit wrote:Yes all ex-spouses of 15 years have close ties to their ex-father-in-laws top-secret occupation.
Nothing to see here. (yawn)
Wow. You really don't want to even consider anything that contradicts the official narrative
I dont. I fail to see the problem even if they are lying.
such a good sheep! do you work for the Police? You know your masters could care less about you either.
Typical wrote:
Floyd the Barber wrote:Wow. You really don't want to even consider anything that contradicts the official narrative
I dont. I fail to see the problem even if they are lying.
Youtube - USS Liberty
point being... false flags happen.
J.R. wrote:
I'm 100 percent convinced that this was a false flag operation. There's not a doubt in my mind.
someone had to do it wrote:
Just like Lance wasn't doping, right J.R.?
I've never said Lance wasn't doping, just like right now I'm not saying the official story is not false, and I've never said that Paula Radcliff doesn't dope either. Look it up.
If you pulled your head from the sand and opened your eyes, instead of being a truth denier, you would be able to see the official story is false.
I took a seminar in college on conspiracy theories.
People always believe them. Here's an explanation why:
So for the conspiracy theorists out there let me understand your logic. Are you saying Dzhokhar Tsarnaev was working for the government? Presumably he can tell the truth now.
So then I guess your logic would be is that the government let him pull this off? Ie Dzhokhar Tsarnaev didn't know the government wanted him to do this?
And if you support the government let him do this argument, please explain how many people you think are in on this. The logic breaks down pretty quickly the more the people in on it.
wejo wrote: ...please explain how many people you think are in on this. The logic breaks down pretty quickly the more the people in on it.
This is the best explanation ever about conspiracy theories and why the vast majority are worthless.
"A secret is not a secret if you tell it to anyone else."
Big plans require a lot of people in on the "secret," otherwise the "secret" can't be pulled off.
The official conspiracy theories we are fed about 911 an d the Boston marathon are filled with holes and lies.
But these you accept.
When anyone points out the inconsistencies or illogic of these narratives, you all scream "conspiracy theory" and do not address any of the points raised.
For example.
On CNN early Saturday morning, the older brother was shown be arrested and put in a police car. I personally did not view this but some people I know did...and there is a video on the net you can watch that shows this. Yet he turns up dead and we are told his brother ran him over.
We were told of the existence of a video showing the younger brother placing bomb number 2 and that this is how the authorities id'ed the bombers. Yet we were not shown the video and now it is no longer even being mentioned.
Uncle Ruslan proclaims the boys guilty and claims they were radicalized. Yet it turns out Uncle Ruslan has not seen them since 2005 and was married to the daughter of a CIA spook and there are many indications that he is also in the spy game.
The FBI denied any knowledge of these boys but was later forced to backtrack on that statement. They later claim to have interviewed/investigated them in 2011 and then dropped them from the suspicious list. We later find out these guys are indeed on a watch list. So the story becomes the authorities see a video -- that they never show us -- that tells them who the bombers are; but then need the public's help identifying two guys -- guys they have investigated and have on a watch list. As if they don't know who they are.
Then, of course, there is the "exchange of fire" with the younger brother who later is found out to have been unarmed. And the videos showing him climbing out of the boat in what appears to be pretty good shape. But we are told he has a serious self inflicted throat injury and cannot speak -- apparently self inflicted by that non-existent gun he used in the exchange of fire. Also, we sure are hearing a lot of what authorities are claiming he has said while in custody for a guy who we were told can't speak.
But you can make all these issues disappear by just calling conspiracy theory.
^so why didn't they kill the other brother in the boat?
Floyd the Barber wrote:
The official conspiracy theories we are fed about 911 an d the Boston marathon are filled with holes and lies.
But these you accept.
When anyone points out the inconsistencies or illogic of these narratives, you all scream "conspiracy theory" and do not address any of the points raised.
For example.
On CNN early Saturday morning, the older brother was shown be arrested and put in a police car. I personally did not view this but some people I know did...and there is a video on the net you can watch that shows this. Yet he turns up dead and we are told his brother ran him over.
We were told of the existence of a video showing the younger brother placing bomb number 2 and that this is how the authorities id'ed the bombers. Yet we were not shown the video and now it is no longer even being mentioned.
Uncle Ruslan proclaims the boys guilty and claims they were radicalized. Yet it turns out Uncle Ruslan has not seen them since 2005 and was married to the daughter of a CIA spook and there are many indications that he is also in the spy game.
The FBI denied any knowledge of these boys but was later forced to backtrack on that statement. They later claim to have interviewed/investigated them in 2011 and then dropped them from the suspicious list. We later find out these guys are indeed on a watch list. So the story becomes the authorities see a video -- that they never show us -- that tells them who the bombers are; but then need the public's help identifying two guys -- guys they have investigated and have on a watch list. As if they don't know who they are.
Then, of course, there is the "exchange of fire" with the younger brother who later is found out to have been unarmed. And the videos showing him climbing out of the boat in what appears to be pretty good shape. But we are told he has a serious self inflicted throat injury and cannot speak -- apparently self inflicted by that non-existent gun he used in the exchange of fire. Also, we sure are hearing a lot of what authorities are claiming he has said while in custody for a guy who we were told can't speak.
But you can make all these issues disappear by just calling conspiracy theory.
This just sounds like incompetent cops and information being released too early before it's verified. People spread news like gossip nowadays because it's so easily exchanged.
Nothing of what you wrote there sounds outlandish, it just sounds like people not getting the full truth.
Typical wrote:
^so why didn't they kill the other brother in the boat?
^... and why did little brother drive over big brother?
And if was a real conspiracy they would've planted a gun in the boat. Or just finished him off on the way to the station, like they did to big brother, right?
Secrets that Aren't Secret wrote:
Typical wrote:^so why didn't they kill the other brother in the boat?
^... and why did little brother drive over big brother?
He did? I thought that was just a lie?
I know, the little brother was working for the CIA to kill the older brother, destroy his entire family, simply for a good paying job.
No wonder why he wore a white hat backwards. He knew the CIA had his back. It's all becomming all too clear now.
Conspiracy theorists are some of the craziest people on earth.
Floyd the Barber wrote:
Dealwithit wrote:Yes all ex-spouses of 15 years have close ties to their ex-father-in-laws top-secret occupation.
Nothing to see here. (yawn)
Wow. You really don't want to even consider anything that contradicts the official narrative
No I'm with you now. The little brother did it. He's working for the CIA. That's why he's alive. He was always so jealous of his older brother getting all the attention. So he contacted the CIA and said I'll give you an excure to go to war with Iran if you just let me kill my brother. I'm sorry I was slow at first but you convinced me now. I'm even going to convert to Islam.
Tell your version to the innocent survivor who has his legs blown off but had the post-surgical courage to identify the younger brother as the one who placed the bag w/the bomb. Was he induced to lie? I suppose this is just another media smokescreen. He had a heck of a lot more courage than any idiot suicide or homicide bomber. I don't doubt the uncle is not telling the whole truth, but he probably wants to hide his ties with big oil and the CIA. Uncle B, you must be a fan of Glenn Beck. I bet you think OJ was innocent too, that Mark Fuhrmann and co. concocted one great big smear campaign.
The best thing Obama could've done was supported the uprising in Iran when it first was gaining traction. That was the beginning of the Arab Spring (not Tunisia) and we might not be dealing with fanatical mullahs and Israel's impending preemption if it were so.
they shot him 15 times and he didn't have a gun, what more did you want??video crews got there before they could finish him off.
Typical wrote:
^so why didn't they kill the other brother in the boat?