calling bs wrote:
Keith Stone, I'm calling BS, muscle flexibility and not looking ripped because of stretching- any real evidence to back this up?
Big studies, no. But anyone that knows anything about elite level swimming knows this:
a) Swimmers competing at a high level have "long" muscles that don't tend to look "buff" unless flexed. You don't need a study to tell, just looking.
b) Flexibility is critical to high performance. Maintaining a minimal surface area means you have to be able to move your arms well in front of your body and also lift them out of the water. Most elite level swimmers can touch their elbows together behind their back. You get that way by stretching out after every workout.
c) Strength is key. Coming off the blocks, walls and being able to oscillate your entire body in a dolphin streamline is not for the weak, not to mention maintaining a solid stroke throughout. I don't know a single elite level swimmer that doesn't do a lot of weight and other forms of resistance training.
d) Endurance is gained the letrun way, mileage. When I was meeting with the SwimMAC Elite swimmers in Charlotte they were averaging 10K in the pool per day. That like a runner doing nearly a marathon every day.
Personally, I saw that doing what I listed above means your body fat is in the low single digits. Sure the gals had slightly higher body fat than guys, but we're talking 4% vs 5%, not 4% vs 10%. This wasn't measured with some caliper, but in the tank with the scale.
So we know off the bat that the assumption that they have lots of body fat is incorrect. We know they train like monsters and they are strong as oxs. We also know they are very flexible.
So putting two and two together it's not some stretch (so to speak) to come to the conclusion that extreme flexibility leads muscles to look long and unbunched, and that the untrained eye unfamiliar with the sport would assume that's fat.