I thought like Weldon that the Skecher's PR person came off looking like a genius. Nike which spends tens of millions if not hundreds of millions looks like a fool and sckechers comes across as a white knight by sponsoring one guy who is already in the top 1% by pro running standards to the tune of a couple hundred thousand each here.This quote to me is worth discussing
WSJ wrote:
Even for top track and field stars, it can be harsh going financially. Steeplechaser Ben Bruce is in the U.S. top 5 in his event and has made three World Championship teams. Yet in 2010, his best competitive year, he had no base salary and earned $20,000, partly from prize money at road races. At the time, he had an exclusive apparel agreement with Nike Inc., which also contributed to his housing and medical insurance.
"I was on food stamps," said Mr. Bruce. "I was having to scrap for everything on my own while [Nike] sat by with the means to help me but chose not to."
When weldon was trying to make it as a runner, I thought it sucked no one would sponsor him and hence LRC was started. So I can relate to bruce being pissed off that he was struggling to get by.
But couldn't his comment of others "With the means to help me chose not to" apply to virtually every company in the world and the entire letsrun.com audience? I mean i could chip in $500. Apple certainly had money. His parents, minister gf, etc.
The thing about the extra sponsors logos to me isn't that big of a deal. I mean yes, maybe a local company throws in 1 or 2k to help a local kid out but if these guys can't get sponsorships from a shoe company, then does anyone really thing a non-shoe company is going to pay a lot?
I think one of these guys ought to put himself up on kickstarted. Say a 2nd logo will go up on my jersey with 1 of 10 donors who give 1k to me.