The volunteer board still wields too much power and USATF is just too big (in terms of the number of disciplines). Needs to be broken up. Road racing, for instance, should be removed completely.
Too many fiefdoms. The field events people fight the distance folks and within the field events the throws fight the jumps.
USATF needs to do what USA Cycling's CEO did and eviscerate the power the board has.
Her twitter account didn't know that:
"A nerd, jock, dork, Queen of Sheba, administrator from hell, bohemian, cosmopolitan, city slicker, small-town girl with an identity problem. USATF Communicatrix
Boston, Indianapolis and NYC"
I cringe at the thought of what USATF would be like if Jill Geer no longer worked there. She's the one holding that place together,in my opinion. It would be a huge mess if she left.
My opinion- he sounds capable and competent and I hope he improves things. Marketing is important but so is management and there are plenty of dysfunctional areas in USATF. I hope he works on some of that internal dysfunction and empire building.
In some ways it's a disadvantage for him not to have more of a background in T&F but maybe being more of an outsider can be an advantage if it means he doesn't fall into a particular camp (distance vs. sprints vs. throws, etc). It looks like he's been around USATF that maybe the learning curve won't be as steep as it was for Logan.
Jill has been and still is working for USATF. She was working out of Boston, but recently moved back to Indianapolis. She's the chief communications officer and has great legs.
Dale Jr. never wins races - will he bring that losing tradition to USATF?
Does Max Siegel troll letsrun.com when things are slow in the office?
ABS
Anybody But Stephanie...
Word
Maybe a person of color can finally turn this sport around. I'm tired of competing in the shadows and being relegated to a two sentence blurb in the Saturday papers. It is time to make track and field a top 10 sport in America.
Color won't help a gutless drone like Max Siegel.
Which U.S. ground combat infantry unit did Max Siegel serve in ? When ? Where ? Combat MOS number ? Thanks.
The Brojos could be forgiven for not realizing they'd been invited to the Siegel teleconference. The notice of the conference went out, no exaggeration, after 15 minutes before the thing started. Anyone who stepped out to get a donut would have missed it. Perhaps USATF wanted people to miss it.
Same oh same oh. They chose an Indy insider who won't do a damn thing for us. Picky Bars tatoos will threaten Siegel's manhood. Watch Siegel approve the expense reports for the same Perk Clubbies ovber and over again. What a sham.
wejo wrote:
Apparently, USATF had a conference call on the hire and forgot to invite the largest online entity that covers the sport of track and field on a daily basisUpdate: Good news LetsRun.com was invited. See post below. (and the only one who looked into the firing of Doug Logan)... little letsrun.com. Maybe we should stop calling ourselves little.
Your email issues aside, the teleconference notice was mixed in with the release, instead of a separate email like they usually are, and they sent it out 15 minutes ahead of time. I'm guessing they let select media sources know in advance and wanted to minimize the number of "bloggers" who would call in.
Rise & Fall wrote:
I hate to tell you but Stephanie has her eunuch. Max Siegel is the perfect stooge for Chaplain and Hightower.
She practically admits as much:
http://usatf.org/events/files/Hightower%20blog%20Siegel%20announcement.pdfMy quick thoughts on the hire.
As for being formerly on the Board and now being CEO I don't blame Max Siegel for that. That solely is the Board's decision. They knew who they were hiring and the criticism it would generate from some quarters.
How about this: Max joins the USATF board. The board is large, Max is only one guy on it. Even if it is somewhat dysfunctional he's only one member on it so he stays on board.
He sees his company can help with marketing USATF so he gets hired partly because of his contacts on the Board. He then quit the USATF Board as he should.
Then from USATF's perspective he does a really good job with marketing and the Board starts thinking, "Why don't we just hire this guy to be CEO?" They saw his performance, he did a good job.
So they "reopen" their CEO search with his name in mind and he gets hired. This second search lasted less than a month. Considering their first one took months and they didn't hire anyone, I don't think the second search was really a search.
Max had done a good job in their minds, it was like an internship for CEO, so why not hire him. The second search was just likely a way to cover their asses and make sure some incredible candidate didn't want the job and Max's background checked out.
That's the favorable reading. A lot of people seem to respect Steve Miller on the USATF Board so hopefully that's what happened. Might be interesting to talk to former great miler Steve Holman who was on the USATF board, was on the first search committee, and resigned from the USATF board this past winter.
On the surface, the hire with a trial run, makes sense.
***
Now onto Max's career before this:
We need someone who knows a lot about NASCAR to chime in.
Overall profile on the guy from Notre Dame law school:
http://law.nd.edu/features/alumni-spotlights/alumni-spotlight-max-siegel-86-ba-92-jd/
December 2006 President Dale Earnhardt Inc (DEI)
He stayed there roughly 2 years. Right after he came on board Dale Earnhardt Jr left so Siegel was fighting an uphill battle.
DEI ended up merging with another team after "New sponsorships didn't materialize"
NascarInsiders.com said don't blame him for the demise of DEI:
http://www.thenascarinsiders.com/2009/01/19/dont-blame-max-siegel/
and he apparently left on good terms:
http://sports.espn.go.com/rpm/nascar/cup/news/story?id=3832604
So he left in January 2009 to be the Diversity Czar at NASCAR. Doesn't seem like a promotion, but rather making the best of situation that may have been beyond his control.
Someone with NASCAR needs to explain the diversity program better to me. By October 2009, the diversity program was revamped and it was more of an academy with from what I can tell one minor league team owned by Max Siegel, Inc.
http://www.usatoday.com/sports/motor/nascar/2009-10-19-drive-for-diversity_N.htm
More here on Max Siegel Inc running the diversity program and owning the team:
That seems like a conflict of interest but I don't know NASCAR.
So maybe he didn't have an official position with NASCAR but their diversity program consisted of his team? Someone fill me in.
Here's an article that talks about how Siegel got a reality show on NASCAR on BET (that itself is impressive) and it says the level of racing is very minor league and NASCAR only funds the team up until a certain point because of the "potential for conflict of interest"
Not sure if he ever left that job as he still seems to own that team.
***
So lets assume the worst about NASCAR.
A less favorable reading would be Max is highly ambitious and not afraid to use one position to get another even if conflicts with some people's view of what should be done.
The people hiring in these instances are aware of the conflicts of interest and they are the ones who should have a problem with it as it could affect their organization. The conflicts of interest are pretty apparent in each instance. Corporate governance people I'm sure would have a problem with it because Board members are supposed to be serving the Company not promoting themselves.
Max could easily say, "I was on the board. I knew I could help. why wouldn't I?"
***
The conflicts of interest have nothing to do with how well a job Max Siegel will do. That's the big issue now. People throw out the words NASCAR and assume that automatically means he'll be a success. Siegel's tenure in NASCAR wasn't all roses and neither was Doug Logan's as CEO of MLS.
Max deserves the benefit of the doubt and hopefully his trial run the last few months means he was doing such a great job the Board decided it had to hire him.
Occam's Razor would say to accept that explanation although with the history of the Board and the firing of Logan I'm sure some of you want to go with more conspiratorial explanations.
***
I did notice after finding the email on the teleconference it was sent out 16 minutes before the teleconference started.
It's not like this was news they didn't control the timing of.
Is Jill Geer still married to Paul Souza - former Wheaton College head coach & USATF High Jump Development coordinator who has pursued his music career full-time in Boston?
If so, how will that work if she works f/t at USATF headquarters??
Best article I've read on the hire:
Although this hire is highly suspect, the decision is done and we're just gonna have to see what he does and where he goes with an open mind.
Yeah, Jill's still married to Sousza. He can expand his musical career to the Midwest.
That article linked up is the first I've seen that mentions Benita Fitzgerald Mosley was a contender for CEO. She actually might have been a decent pick, but maybe Hightower didn't like the idea of another ex-hurdler getting the gig. Benita's got far better people skills than she does, in any case.
Seems like he's qualified and may breathe some new life into this stagnant, poorly run organization. However, as with everything that USATF seems to touch, the decision is controversial and smacks of "insider trading." We all remember that Craig seemed to sell us off to Nike and then left to take a job with....Nike. Will he recieve the same treatment as Logan if he tries to take down some of the do nothings on the board? Unlikely as a former board member.
time will tell.