The usual suspects finished 1,2,3 for Stanford.
blackirish wrote:
Women results do not constitute as real results.
If your post constituted an actual sentence it would be structured as:
Women's results do not constitute real results.
Of course, it would still be false - only false in a more intelligible way.
Full Results Women:
http://www.sml1.com/recordtiming/pac10/xc2010/w_res.htm
1 Stanford 62 2 5 8 21 26 27 49
Total Time: 1:41:39.41
Average: 20:19.89
2 Arizona 65 7 11 12 13 22 25 29
Total Time: 1:42:17.40
Average: 20:27.48
3 Oregon 68 1 4 16 23 24 32 35
Total Time: 1:41:47.65
Average: 20:21.53
3 Washington 68 6 10 15 18 19 34 36
Total Time: 1:42:15.56
Average: 20:27.12
5 California 132 3 28 30 33 38 42 46
Total Time: 1:43:50.76
Average: 20:46.16
6 Ucla 165 17 20 31 43 54 62 66
Total Time: 1:45:16.48
Average: 21:03.30
7 Arizona State 188 9 39 41 48 51 52 57
Total Time: 1:46:00.99
Average: 21:12.20
8 Oregon State 245 40 44 47 55 59 60 64
Total Time: 1:48:17.65
Average: 21:39.53
9 Washington St. 252 37 45 53 56 61 63 65
Total Time: 1:48:34.68
Average: 21:42.94
10 Usc 257 14 50 58 67 68 69 70
Total Time: 1:49:56.17
Average: 21:59.24
Men:
http://www.sml1.com/recordtiming/pac10/xc2010/m_res.htm
1 Stanford 25 1 2 3 9 10 11 15
Total Time: 1:56:38.33
Average: 23:19.67
2 Oregon 56 4 7 8 13 24 25 32
Total Time: 1:58:05.40
Average: 23:37.08
3 California 86 6 12 19 22 27 36 54
Total Time: 1:59:26.49
Average: 23:53.30
4 Ucla 101 16 17 18 21 29 31 43
Total Time: 2:00:23.45
Average: 24:04.69
5 Arizona State 143 14 23 28 38 40 46 47
Total Time: 2:01:38.63
Average: 24:19.73
6 Washington St. 158 20 30 34 35 39 52 55
Total Time: 2:02:03.28
Average: 24:24.66
7 Washington 181 26 33 37 41 44 45 50
Total Time: 2:02:47.60
Average: 24:33.52
8 Arizona 195 5 42 48 49 51 53
Total Time: 2:03:16.55
Average: 24:39.31
Just got back from the races. Nothing like cross country in the rain. Congrats to all the teams, but Stanford looked really dominant out there.
What a battle for top 4 teams.
Arizona has really come on this season.
Arizona is apparently coming back onto the national scene in XC. It is so great to see the Pac 10 with so many strong teams.
I am wondering though, whatever happened to all those Washington women from 2008 who should be juniors and seniors and leading their team? I did notice an earlier post that Christine Babcock ran today, even though she has been injured for a year, and didn't run especially well today. Why would a coach let her run, and waste her final season when the team is not going anywhere this year?
Bottom line is ASU has fallen off the map. You might say that they are young... pretty much they suck, they don't get any recruits, they take a girl who was a 4 time footlocker finalist and she runs slower than she ever did in HS and boys.... hummmmmm well it is sad.... poor ASU :(...
This is always a potential problem, especially with female runners. Being a FL finalist doesn't mean much if an athlete's body changes, or if goals and priorities in life change.
ASU is a fantastic program and has an intelligent and diligent coaching staff. They were good, they are good, and they will continue to be good. Enough said.
Oregon's Depth is scary bad
Guess Vin is still looking for that 5th man?
ha ha... were good... not now. Actions speak.
Top 3 Stanford at 23 flat for 8k. 4:37 pace... Wow. Just wow.
The way I see it they have three homies who could lay down 27:25-27:45 on the track. Wow is right.
Unbelievable wrote:
Top 3 Stanford at 23 flat for 8k. 4:37 pace... Wow. Just wow.
coachkritter wrote:
Guess Vin is still looking for that 5th man?
yeah and then some. I mean theyll a solid team today, but lack a 5, and next year they lose Acosta, Mercado and centorwitz, leaving Luke as their lone top guy, and the guys moving up will no doubt make up some time, but they had quite a few guys pretty far back. But alas, with their name and the success that they've enjoyed in recent history, plus with Vin's recruiting/development, Im sure we will see the stars reallign for oregon by next year
Hasay FTMFW!!!! Quack Quack, Ducks rule!