Teacher sends nude text to student

I'm not pretending. I am really and truly not attracted to children.

...wow

Guardian Ad Litem wrote:

I'm not pretending. I am really and truly not attracted to children.

Either you are a woman, or you need to get your hormone levels checked. There are plenty of 15 year old girls that should be seen as physically attractive to adult men. We've made a decision on the cultural front to prohibit ourselves from acting on that attraction and wanting to have sex with them, but that does nothing to change that our basic biology makes us find them physically attractive in the first place.

I hope you're not a Biology teacher. You have confused our society's legal standard of what defines a child with what nature tells us.When females develop breasts and hips, we're supposed to be attracted. They are called secondary sexual characteristics for a reason; it is part of what determines that they are, in fact, women.The law is the law, and you can't f*ck them, but don't pretend you're on some kind of moral high ground here. Frankly, like the poster above said, if you're not attracted, there is something wrong with you.

Guardian Ad Litem wrote:

I'm not pretending. I am really and truly not attracted to children.

xx wrote:

I hope you're not a Biology teacher. You have confused our society's legal standard of what defines a child with what nature tells us.

When females develop breasts and hips, we're supposed to be attracted. They are called secondary sexual characteristics for a reason; it is part of what determines that they are, in fact, women.

The law is the law, and you can't f*ck them, but don't pretend you're on some kind of moral high ground here. Frankly, like the poster above said, if you're not attracted, there is something wrong with you.

This discussion is going nowhere. I can think a 4 year old is 'cute', but that doesn't make me want to 'F' 'em regardless of the law. When it comes to 15 year olds, sure they are atrac-TIVE (we can all look at any person and rate whether they are 'good looking')that doesn't mean I am atrac-TED. When I was 23, yeah, maybe. now that I'm over 40, there is a mental maturity that they DO NOT possess and that is a HUGE turn off. Jus' Sayin'...

Yep, she's a pedophile.

some dude wrote:

Guardian Ad Litem wrote:

I'm not pretending. I am really and truly not attracted to children.

Either you are a woman, or you need to get your hormone levels checked. There are plenty of 15 year old girls that should be seen as physically attractive to adult men. We've made a decision on the cultural front to prohibit ourselves from acting on that attraction and wanting to have sex with them, but that does nothing to change that our basic biology makes us find them physically attractive in the first place.

Only if you objectify them based on appearance. I've yet to hear a single 15 year-old open his or her mouth that I would care to tolerate listening to for even 10 minutes, let alone find what they say and do at all charming. Kids in the USA (especially those with their own cell phones) are sheltered and spoiled, only someone with a desire to exploit would find that at all attractive.

The discussion is going nowhere because you don't get it. A fifteen-year old is a woman biologically, regardless of what the law says. A four-year old is not a woman, biologically or legally. For f*cks sake, did I really need to elaborate that far?

Your attempt at semantics fell flat. If you find them physically attractive, then you are attracted to them. Mentally they are not at a point where you consider them dating or marriage material - and neither do I, but that just means you don't consider them the complete package, not that you aren't attracted to them.

Red Glare wrote:

Yep, she's a pedophile.

No, a pedophile has a PREFERENCE for prepubescent people. A Hebephile has a PREFERENCE for adolescent people (age 14-24). That is a big difference. Also, note the word "preference" vs a one-time occurrence.

To the poster who was asking, I'm female, so maybe that plays a role in my ability to resist those manly middle school boys, but wait a minute...this thread is about a woman accused of offering sex to minors...does she need to get her hormones checked?

Like the poster above me said, of course young people can be attractive, but if you're in the position of being an educator, or a caretaker, coach, whatever, you had better know the difference between consensual sex between two adults and coercing a young person into relations.

As far as the biology argument...that poster is completely missing the point. Thankfully we do live in a time and culture that no longer allows base sexual needs to rule over the safety and emotional welfare of kids.

And no, I'm not a pedophile, G.A.L.s are court advocates for victims of child abuse.

Red Glare, did someone knock you around as a kid? Too bad you didn't have a Guardian Ad Litem looking out for you.

Some dude and your online friend who is posting here, you are repulsive.

41 divided by 2 is 20.5, plus 7 is 27.5, so this guy was about 12.5 years too young for her.

GET A LIFE.

A little jealous maybe?

There was an entire South Park episode based on this.

Toots, are you the subject of this thread?

11111111987 wrote:

Some dude and your online friend who is posting here, you are repulsive.

No, he's right on the money. All throughout time as far back as you feel like going when man was on Earth, the development of secondary sex characteristics has corresponded with what the male brain perceives as sexually attractive.

However, we also now know in our current society, it may not be in their best interest to treat them as such, and so we have imposed unnatural but likely necessary laws against adults fornicating with them.

The majority of adult men who outright say they would never find a teenage (under 18) female attractive are simply brainwashed and trying to conform to the shape in which society has molded them.

Extra Credit: What top runner went to Londonderry HS in New Hampsire?

Mr.Marsh wrote:

niceeeeeee

I was first to post it wrote:

Niiiccccceeeeee.

NIiiiiiiiiiceeeeeeeeeeeee

And the majority of adult men who outright say that teenage women are attractive are simply unable to accept their own advanced age and that of the women closer to their own age who should be far more attractive to them in non-visual ways than any teenager ever could be. Or they haven't come to grips with the remnants of the urge to spread their seed. Monogamy is unnatural, too, but talk about how you have or merely would like to screw someone other than your wife on here and the holy roller brigade will jump all over that.

;lkadf;lkj wrote:

The majority of adult men who outright say they would never find a teenage (under 18) female attractive are simply brainwashed and trying to conform to the shape in which society has molded them.

John Mortimer