wont happen wrote:
Flagpole wrote:The only difference there is that for a woman 1:55 is world class, but if you've got a male who can get from 2:07 or so to 1:55 in one year and that is his ceiling, then gender shouldn't matter in this case.WTF? Do you even follow athletics? So if there is a male who's gone from 11.6 one season to 10.6 the next in the 100m, should be no big deal if a female does the same thing then, eh? The only difference is that for the female, the 10.6 just happens to be world class. No biggie, right?
Gender so painfully DOES matter in this case, as being male is what allowed for such an improvement in the first place.
To recap: show me ONE female, anywhere, who has gone from 2:08 to 1:55 in ONE FRICKIN' YEAR. It has not happened.
THIS is why I say that if she does "pass" the gender test, I wanna see the training behind her.
You can't have a sampling because 1:55 is so good for a woman at 800 meters that the vast majority who could even sniff that time LIKELY got there over years of running. You seem to be forgetting that "she" is just 18 years old; assuming she's a she, she's just a phenom; Bekele was a phenom too. That kind of improvement for a NEW runner at that age, assuming the person has the ability to get that fast, is not so amazing that it just has to be a man. In high school there was a girl on my team that improved from a 26+ minute 5k as a junior to 19:something as a senior. That's a pretty crazy jump.