So if I were in the last 3 weeks of a season would it be good to do these the day before a race or maybe two days out from a race in place of strides?
So if I were in the last 3 weeks of a season would it be good to do these the day before a race or maybe two days out from a race in place of strides?
I wouldn't do them within 2 days of a stride whether before or after. It can sometimes stress the calves/Achilles until they adapt, plus it might put more of a strain on your runner if they haven't figured out how to keep the workout to only using their creatine phosphate stores. Hudson recommends starting your first hill sprinting workout with... 1 repetition. That's right. Like with any stress, your body gets better with adaptation and you accomplish nothing if it's going to hurt you. Do a minimum amount and then add more as you're able.
So, I'd recommend 3 days before or 3 days after a race. Have the athlete do a few. The best way to know when to stop is the moment the athlete starts feeling a little less coordinated. Odds are your athlete can get in 5-7 of them without much trouble.
Hudson recommends starting from scratch and then (over a few weeks) building up to a maximum like 10 of them and then doing just 6-8 late in season as maintenance.
Ideally, you do these pretty frequently all season long and just stick it in where strides would otherwise be done once or twice per week.
[Hopefully the 2 minute hills Bramble mentioned were something you did earlier in the season, as it would be too late to try and start those now.]
Shoebacca wrote:
I wouldn't do them within 2 days of a stride whether before or after. It can sometimes stress the calves/Achilles until they adapt, plus it might put more of a strain on your runner if they haven't figured out how to keep the workout to only using their creatine phosphate stores. Hudson recommends starting your first hill sprinting workout with... 1 repetition. That's right. Like with any stress, your body gets better with adaptation and you accomplish nothing if it's going to hurt you. Do a minimum amount and then add more as you're able.
So, I'd recommend 3 days before or 3 days after a race. Have the athlete do a few. The best way to know when to stop is the moment the athlete starts feeling a little less coordinated. Odds are your athlete can get in 5-7 of them without much trouble.
Hudson recommends starting from scratch and then (over a few weeks) building up to a maximum like 10 of them and then doing just 6-8 late in season as maintenance.
Ideally, you do these pretty frequently all season long and just stick it in where strides would otherwise be done once or twice per week.
[Hopefully the 2 minute hills Bramble mentioned were something you did earlier in the season, as it would be too late to try and start those now.]
Thanks Shoe. You have steered me straight a number of times. I appreciate it.
Are you a coach? Veteran runner?
fUrCeOsNhN wrote:
haha, brilliant!
short hill sprints develop speed almost as well as sprints on the track with much less risk of injury.
Are you joking, what is your 100 meter time?
Shoebacca wrote:
I wouldn't do them within 2 days of a stride whether before or after. It can sometimes stress the calves/Achilles until they adapt, plus it might put more of a strain on your runner if they haven't figured out how to keep the workout to only using their creatine phosphate stores.
What??? Hill sprints are ideal the day before a race or even the same day as the race. The stress on the calves is minimal because the speed is low even no matter how hard you go.
And creatine phosphate is NOT the main energy supplier in a 10- 12 second effort, it diminishes rapidly after just 2 seconds and most of it is used up after about 6 seconds. Glycogenolysis (not glycolysis) is the main energy supplier.
The Bramble and the Rose wrote:
The main benefit of short uphill sprints is probably neurological. As long as the grade is not so steep (about 14% grade is close to the upper limit) and the duration of each sprint bout not so long as to significantly alter or even impair stride mechanics, this represents as high a level of motor neuron recruitment as you can get in a running-specific context. The combination of speed and resistance produces an extremely high degree of both recruitment and "rate coding" in synergistic muscles. Believe it or not, when it comes to improvement, the speed is more influential than the resistance offered by the hill. But when speed and resistance are combined (and balanced in appropriate conjunction with level-surface sprinting or even gentle downgrade freewheeling), the ability to regulate force through proportional control is topped off.
Any exercise which recruits large motor neurons within major muscle groups can promote the release of growth hormone as long as nutritional requirements are met to supply amino acids. Squats and dead lifts do the same thing, but they obviously aren't sport-specific.
You might be feeling stronger as a result of a growth hormone boost, but it's just as likely you feel lighter and snappier because of the improved neural allocation (the benefits are noticed fairly quickly), because of having fortified your phosphocreatine system (which facilitates the warmup process) and because of the sheer variety in the routine.
To effect the best boost to the phosphocreatine system (and to improve proportional control at speed), work up to 3 sets of 5 or 6 of the short uphill sprints (you don't have to spend 12 seconds on the actual hill for this; a run-up of 2-3 seconds on a flat section to establish some speed before starting the hill is best for form retention, followed by about 8-9 seconds on the hill) with a slow jog down and a little extra time at the bottom, for a total recovery period of about a minute between reps within a set. This format allows for partial restoration of the phosphocreatine (starting with roughly 80% replenishment and dwindling with each successive rep) while still applying a functionally continual stress to the system. Take about 5-7 minutes (walking for a couple of minutes, then some jogging, then about another minute of walking) between sets to "almost completely" restore the system.
If you're a pure middle distance runner, you can use this session once a week during the last half of the off-season. For another supplementary addendum, tack on a single set of about 8 reps of short hill sprints (use about 3 reps to warm up to speed and get accustomed to the hill) following a medium-effort "tempo" type of workout on another day of the week (it's best to include some dynamic drills and several level-surface or gentle downslope high-speed buildups in your warmup prior to the "tempo" effort if you're going to approach top speed afterwards). So you can get two days per week which incorporate hill sprints - one is a full-fledged workout which is started completely fresh; the other is as an annex to a moderate-effort "high end" or "threshold" workout to briefly summon the full spectrum of motor neurons following mild to moderate fatigue of the more resistant oxidative muscle fibers.
In regards to oxygen uptake, sprinting for short distances with recovery periods, even when repeated dozens of times, can affect single stroke volume, but this has only a marginal effect on O2 uptake. The muscle fibers involved in full-speed uphill sprinting are of larger diameter than those used in sustained running and more space within these fibers is devoted to contractile structures designed for force production, leaving less room for mitochondria or blood vessel supply. In fact, when they are recruited, their contractile force is often great enough to constrict their own blood supply, meaning they are forced to rely on their own stores of anaerobic energy, which is one factor contributing to their quicker fatigue. Furthermore, the heart, being a "twitch" muscle rather than a "tetanic" muscle, requires a few minutes of continuous exercise to reach the kind of sustained stroke volume employed during fast continuous running. Such sustained delivery of oxygen is generally required for significant improvement to take place in O2 uptake.
Running-specific myocardial O2 demand (which stimulates the ventricular hypertrophy contributing to higher O2 consumption) is best created from segments of about 2 to 2.5 minutes of uphill (6%-8% grade) running at an effort similar to 5k race pace on the track. This does place a more continual pressure on the blood vessels which supply the race-specific (oxidative) muscle fibers, forcing a higher prolonged stroke volume than level-surface reps of the same duration would accomplish.
Cool stuff...is it legit?
Most of it. Apart from the left ventricular hypertrophy/higher oxygen uptake stuff.
I think you can maintain stroke volume with hill sprints, but left ventriuclar hypertrophy is an effect of adapting to sweating more and tha's what produces the response of a thicker heart wall muscle and consequent higher stroke volume and blood (plasma not red blood cell) volume. But that doesn't increase oxygen uptake, that's a popular myth. It gives you more endurance in races where you sweat a lot (duh).
This adaption is gained and lost so quickly that it must be mostly water, glycogen and sodium that causes the increased ventricular hypertrophy.
You will know you are gaining or losing this adaption because your resting and working heart rates go down when you are gaining the adaption and up when you are losing it. This is because the three things ventricular hypertrophy and stroke volume and plasma volume are inter related and with more blood volume you pump more blood per beat more slowly and with less blood volume you pump less blood more quickly with each beat. It's of no benefit to have a high blood volume in races less than 5 minutes because you aren't sweating much during the race.
JonO. wrote:
Most of it. Apart from the left ventricular hypertrophy/higher oxygen uptake stuff.
I think you can maintain stroke volume with hill sprints, but left ventriuclar hypertrophy is an effect of adapting to sweating more and tha's what produces the response of a thicker heart wall muscle and consequent higher stroke volume and blood (plasma not red blood cell) volume. But that doesn't increase oxygen uptake, that's a popular myth. It gives you more endurance in races where you sweat a lot (duh).
This adaption is gained and lost so quickly that it must be mostly water, glycogen and sodium that causes the increased ventricular hypertrophy.
You will know you are gaining or losing this adaption because your resting and working heart rates go down when you are gaining the adaption and up when you are losing it. This is because the three things ventricular hypertrophy and stroke volume and plasma volume are inter related and with more blood volume you pump more blood per beat more slowly and with less blood volume you pump less blood more quickly with each beat. It's of no benefit to have a high blood volume in races less than 5 minutes because you aren't sweating much during the race.
Wow, Jon. Starting off the New Year under your real name with the same moranic diatribe. Was this a resolution of yours?
Combined uphill and downhill sprint running training is more efficacious than horizontal
Does anyone have experience in doing these 10-12 second sprints on a treadmill? What gradient do you normally use? I am limited in access to hills.
Thanks for your help.
bradmase wrote:
Does anyone have experience in doing these 10-12 second sprints on a treadmill? What gradient do you normally use? I am limited in access to hills.
Thanks for your help.
I start at 8% and by the time I'm on my last one I've got it on 10%.