Yet again an attempt to debate a sensible way forward for distance running in the UK is brought back down to the 'if you havent run fast what do you know' level. By that definition no-one bar the likes of Coe & ovett should be allowed to make suggestions.
The post was asking whether racing in September would be to the detriment of longer term success i.e. next summer and beyond?
I would suggest most of the guys mentioned more than have the ability to step up to good international class, certainly the 'chase boys seem to have the tools to go into the low 8.20s, judging by their performances at shorter distances. However if you're focussing on racing all the time, where does the base building come in? Just because these guys aren YET at the level they cold be, I'm sure several months of high level training could help them make the move, rather than always going for the next race. Most of them would have been on the track within the last month.
You're the one showing disrespect by suggesting:
"they are not going to be competitive international GB runners are they!?"
Why when someone tries to have a discussion and make a suggestion should you 'disrespect' them. Why not make a valid argument to refute the point?
No-one said the 'old school' never ran the relays - in April at the 12 stage. I'm not sure the 6 stage would ever feature too highly in priorities.
Put it this way - you can bet most of the worlds top 50 5K runners will not be thinking baout racing road relays at this time of year - they'll be at home, recovering before piling in the miles big time, and coming out and looking to IMPROVE next season. Just because you may not run as fast as them, doesnt mean you should ignore the evidence. The point isn't really about GB success or International success or whatever, its about the best way for the better guys to get better.