You don’t speak for “every single person” who read the post, there’s no way you could possibly know how everyone interpreted it, and presenting your opinion as consensus doesn’t make it one.
More importantly, you still seem oddly fixated on finding a way to paint the family as dishonest. Even if there were some ambiguity in wording, jumping straight to accusations of misleading people, even calling them liars, says more about your approach than theirs.
And none of this changes the central issue you keep sidestepping: a kid was approved to race, made plans based on that approval, and then had it revoked, losing the opportunity to compete. That’s the real problem here.
Whether you want to nitpick the exact sequence of how it was phrased doesn’t change the reality of the situation or the impact on the family. At this point, it feels less like you’re trying to clarify facts and more like you’re determined to assign blame where it doesn’t belong.