They've been doing that in the Southern US for decades, and it's only had like a 5-7% effect of overall IQ.
I assume when you say "Southern US" you mean California, New York, and Massachusetts since it's legal there.
It’s one thing to have it on the books (most likely out of laziness) and another to have issued a recent notice about it. This happened with beastiality and Denmark unless they got rid of it a few years ago.
My say something nice is no one is suggesting you marry your own sister.
I didn't say it wasn't noticeable. By the mere fact that I reported the IQ decrease in specific percentages, I'm saying it's noticeable. If it can be measured, it's noticeable.
Anything else, Jefferson?
But wouldn't that really mean it was just dumb people having to resort to cousin marriage more often?
Logically, two smart cousins would have smarter offspring than average, eventually. That's basic breeding science.
The legal status of first cousin marriage varies considerably from one U.S. state to another, ranging from being legal in some states to being a criminal offense in others. It is illegal or largely illegal in 32 states and le...
If you look at the US states where first cousin marriage is legal, I don't think it's because they're dominated by Pakistanis or Muslims or whatever the subtext is to OP's post.