Absurd. I've observed his tactics for years. He's not shining a light on darked corners. He's hiding behind the cloak of anonymity to cast aspersions on public figures. It's cowardly, pathetic, and disgusting.
Usually his "analysis" is merely "that person is good, therefore that person is doping." He is rarely aware of context and often fixates on results. Oh, and there's a weird disturbing pattern where he thinks Brits and Kiwis are clean but nobody else. He clearly has an anti-American bias.
There is no meaningful dialogue with him because HE shuts down dialogue by refusing to even consider alternative explanations for why an athlete is good. He makes up his mind before posting and isn't open to other perspectives.
He doesn't respect the topics of threads. No matter what a thread is about, if the subject is one of his targets, he will try to make the thread about doping. He is a habitual thread derailer.
He often repeats the same "arguments" over and over again. He doesn't really say anything insightful or new; he just finds different words to accuse someone of doping.
He often insults other posters.
He rarely has anything complimentary to say about current athletes. It's generally criticism and accusations.
He thinks he's shining a light on dark corners, but the reality is he's only exposing himself as a curmudgeon. He's the proverbial old man yelling at the clouds.