They should have appealed (if possible? Salazar appealed the arbitrators' decision...), as - according to their own claims - justice was not served. Essentially, he should at best have said what you said he said essentially, but did not.
See also Tygart's newest statement, which reads like from Knighton's lawyer:
"Trenbolone, the substance in Knighton’s case, is a known livestock enhancer and known to be found in the meat supply. The level in the athlete’s sample was below 1ng/ml, and the meat he ate was proven to be from the same supplier of meat at the restaurant that was later analyzed and tested positive for trenbolone."
No mentioning anymore of USADA's earlier claim that the amounts found were inconsistent with the contamination claim.
And from the decision, USADA's own expert is quoted with:
"Dr. Dalton concluded in his report that Respondent either consumed: (1) a meal of considerably higher concentration (~38 ng/g) of free trenbolone on March 22-23, (2) a separate dose of free trenbolone of over 19,000 nanograms on March 22-23, or (3) a larger dose of about 100 mg trenbolone acetate on or about March 11"
And USADA themselves:
"Second, the amount of the detected trenbolone did not correlate to the science
regarding metabolism in humans. Claimant urges that Respondent’s consumption of oxtail so long before sample collection does not account for the concentration of epitrenbolone in his sample."
And now comes Tygart, and pretends it's from the oxtail after all. Too funny.