Henrik was flagged as likely doping years ago and I have no reason to believe Jakob is any cleaner.
Yes, but there’s a reason why Henrik wasn’t convicted, and why there wasn’t even raised a case against him. Maybe you should do some efforts to find out something about this..?
So do you children have anything to say on the thread subject?
You told the forum to be so happy when your beloved Ingy is beaten by Kerr and Whightman. According to previous quotes of yours, both are dopers.
It's the first time I see you to be happy about dopers winning - why is it?
I didn't say either were dopers. That is your obsession. I simply observed in response to the OP that Jakob's last 100m was even more "beautiful" when he finishes behind other runners - whoever or whatever they are.
But you still haven't said anything on the thread subject. You never do.
This post was edited 1 minute after it was posted.
You told the forum to be so happy when your beloved Ingy is beaten by Kerr and Whightman. According to previous quotes of yours, both are dopers.
It's the first time I see you to be happy about dopers winning - why is it?
I didn't say either were dopers. That is your obsession. I simply observed in response to the OP that Jakob's last 100m was even more "beautiful" when he finishes behind other runners - whoever or whatever they are.
But you still haven't said anything on the thread subject. You never do.
You have clearly stated that no clean athlete can be better than the best doped athlete. So maked Kerr and Wightman - for you - dopers.
And - no - you have stated that Jakob's finish is even more beautiful when he finishes behind Kerr or Wightman
I didn't say either were dopers. That is your obsession. I simply observed in response to the OP that Jakob's last 100m was even more "beautiful" when he finishes behind other runners - whoever or whatever they are.
But you still haven't said anything on the thread subject. You never do.
You have clearly stated that no clean athlete can be better than the best doped athlete. So maked Kerr and Wightman - for you - dopers.
And - no - you have stated that Jakob's finish is even more beautiful when he finishes behind Kerr or Wightman
You continue to be obsessed with what I say about subjects other than the thread, which is Jakob's last 100m being "a thing of beauty". Still nothing to say about that?
You have clearly stated that no clean athlete can be better than the best doped athlete. So maked Kerr and Wightman - for you - dopers.
And - no - you have stated that Jakob's finish is even more beautiful when he finishes behind Kerr or Wightman
You continue to be obsessed with what I say about subjects other than the thread, which is Jakob's last 100m being "a thing of beauty". Still nothing to say about that?
You contradict yourself so often. And you are lying, so often.
For you, Kerr and Wightman are dopers. Why are you so happy to see them beating Ingebrigtsen?
How does he keep is head from moving at all when he runs all-out? And his arms moving the same no matter his speed.
Honestly, I think it's Jakobs first 100 that is the thing of beauty.
"Hey guys, you want to go ahead and kickstart your lactic acid production (even if ever so slightly) by sprinting off the line and running a 13.0 when you want to run a 56.5 first lap? (14.0-14.1 pace) - sure, knock yourselves out. I'll do the opposite and just run on pace from the first meters of this one".