Why do we need another Covid vax thread?
We reached a consensus on the other thread that the pandemic is over. Omicron ended it - something the vaccines had failed to do after more than a year of availability.
No more to discuss. It’s over.
We had another thread with nearly 20,000 posts about the Covid-19 vaccine, but we feel it's outdated and will make this the official Vaccine thread for the year 2024. This thread was originally titled “2024 Official Covid-19 vaccine thread: Ex-CDC director says it's high time to admit "significant side effects" of covid-19 vaccines” but we wanted a more neutral title. The old thread is here: https://www.letsrun.com/forum/...
-
85
-
Yolos29 wrote:
Why do we need another Covid vax thread?
We reached a consensus on the other thread that the pandemic is over. Omicron ended it - something the vaccines had failed to do after more than a year of availability.
No more to discuss. It’s over.
Because its fun to post?
Especially when morons assert consensus, spam the same low-effort posts, and never provide evidence. I enjoy the day-to-day of playing with anti-vaxxers.
49 -
Harambe wrote:
The vaccine causes rare issues - nobody disputes this.
Clinical trials and post approval monitoring have shown it’s a clear net positive for all groups for which it was approved.People act like it’s illegal to discuss adverse events. It was the CDC that was one of the first to raise the alarm on myocarditis in young men, for example. Redfield says nothing new and doesn’t say the vaccine is a bad idea for anyone.
Of course, antivaxxers will misrepresent him because they’re desperate for someone who’s not a true lunatic or nazi to be on their side.
Jesus Christ, you really can’t exist outside of this forum. That’s ok. I’m just going to keep posting this clip on every page where you respond.
Redfield says a lot that’s new, including but not limited to, long vax exists, long vax is caused by the mRNA vaccines but not the dead protein Novavax vaccine (which was always a better idea), vaccines weren’t critical for people under 50, really only for 60, 65+, he doesn’t like the mRNA because he neither knows how much spike protein is being made or how long it’s being made for (a week, a month?), that the three letter agencies lacked transparency, and that mandates were never a good idea.
You can disagree with everything he says, call him an antivaxxer, tell him his long vax patients don’t exist and are made up, say there was never a mandate, or say he’s just jealous that he didn’t get credit for the Covid vaccines (all of which you have said 😂😂😂🤦♂️🤦♂️🤦♂️) but let’s not pretend he didn’t actually say any of this. You know, basically my position for the past 3+ years. God bless him for having the courage to speak out.
142 -
Yolos29 wrote:
Why do we need another Covid vax thread?
We reached a consensus on the other thread that the pandemic is over. Omicron ended it - something the vaccines had failed to do after more than a year of availability.
No more to discuss. It’s over.
Exactly. Plus, Redfield gets the last word because he’s right (he’s trusting his eyes). Don’t worry, this thread will get killed too…
82 -
Sub-9:00 guy wrote:
Harambe wrote:
The vaccine causes rare issues - nobody disputes this.
Clinical trials and post approval monitoring have shown it’s a clear net positive for all groups for which it was approved.People act like it’s illegal to discuss adverse events. It was the CDC that was one of the first to raise the alarm on myocarditis in young men, for example. Redfield says nothing new and doesn’t say the vaccine is a bad idea for anyone.
Of course, antivaxxers will misrepresent him because they’re desperate for someone who’s not a true lunatic or nazi to be on their side.
Jesus Christ, you really can’t exist outside of this forum. That’s ok. I’m just going to keep posting this clip on every page where you respond.
Redfield says a lot that’s new, including but not limited to, long vax exists, long vax is caused by the mRNA vaccines but not the dead protein Novavax vaccine (which was always a better idea), vaccines weren’t critical for people under 50, really only for 60, 65+, he doesn’t like the mRNA because he neither knows how much spike protein is being made or how long it’s being made for (a week, a month?), that the three letter agencies lacked transparency, and that mandates were never a good idea.
You can disagree with everything he says, call him an antivaxxer, tell him his long vax patients don’t exist and are made up, say there was never a mandate, or say he’s just jealous that he didn’t get credit for the Covid vaccines (all of which you have said 😂😂😂🤦♂️🤦♂️🤦♂️) but let’s not pretend he didn’t actually say any of this. You know, basically my position for the past 3+ years. God bless him for having the courage to speak out.
"Long vax" = severe adverse events which are:
1) proven to be extremely rare
2) well documented in post-approval monitoring
3) acknowledged by public health officials and the vaccine companies themselves
Why is it not big news? Because they are extremely rare and thus don't change the risk calculation much. It's that simple. It's not new.
715 -
Sub-9:00 guy wrote:
Yolos29 wrote:
Why do we need another Covid vax thread?
We reached a consensus on the other thread that the pandemic is over. Omicron ended it - something the vaccines had failed to do after more than a year of availability.
No more to discuss. It’s over.
Exactly. Plus, Redfield gets the last word because he’s right (he’s trusting his eyes). Don’t worry, this thread will get killed too…
Killed in another 3 years :)
stuck_in_here_with_me.gif
313 -
2600 bro wrote:
Yolos29 wrote:
Why do we need another Covid vax thread?
We reached a consensus on the other thread that the pandemic is over. Omicron ended it - something the vaccines had failed to do after more than a year of availability.
No more to discuss. It’s over.
Because its fun to post?
Especially when morons assert consensus, spam the same low-effort posts, and never provide evidence. I enjoy the day-to-day of playing with anti-vaxxers.
You seem to be pretty upset from the last thread. 🤔
Youre taking the L pretty hard. Perhaps you’ll fare better on this thread. 😂
102 -
Harambe wrote:
Welcome everyone to the official new vaccine thread.
Let's keep it clean and fair and not forget the only ground rule:
1) The gorilla is always right
cheers!
Reminder, let's try to stick to the rules
411 -
Sub-9:00 guy wrote:
Yolos29 wrote:
Why do we need another Covid vax thread?
We reached a consensus on the other thread that the pandemic is over. Omicron ended it - something the vaccines had failed to do after more than a year of availability.
No more to discuss. It’s over.
Exactly. Plus, Redfield gets the last word because he’s right (he’s trusting his eyes). Don’t worry, this thread will get killed too…
Yep. Harambro will cry to the mods again and ask that it get deleted when he’s embarrassed again. 👍
Lets get it on! 👍
102 -
Yolos29 wrote:
You seem to be pretty upset from the last thread. 🤔
Youre taking the L pretty hard. Perhaps you’ll fare better on this thread. 😂
That’s not the only thing Harambe takes hard
93 -
This is a site dedicated to running, so in this new vax thread, for the record I declare the following:
I am zero-dose unvaccinated. Healthy, active and strong for 1531 of the last 1533 days. Durable protection gained through a 2-day Omicron illness in January 2022.
Age 64. 5K race in 25:09 on May 5.
Boring, but it beats the drama of non-stop doctor appointments for a perpetual illness brought on by a Covid vaccine injury.
125 -
We had another thread wigth nearly 20,000 posts about the COvid-19 vaccine, but we feel it's outdated and will make this the official Vaccine thread for the year 2024. The old thread is here: https://www.letsrun.com/forum/...
1) If it were my decision, I'd pick a more neutral title like "2024 Official Covid-19 vaccine thread".
2) I'd limit the thread to registered posters only so as to discourage the sorts of anonymous personal attacks that plagued the previous thread.
3) In moderating this thread, and the forum in general, I'd take a much broader view of what does not constitute "civil discussion".
It's not my decision of course, and I've suggested these sorts of things previously.
38 -
Sub-9:00 guy wrote:
Yolos29 wrote:
Why do we need another Covid vax thread?
We reached a consensus on the other thread that the pandemic is over. Omicron ended it - something the vaccines had failed to do after more than a year of availability.
No more to discuss. It’s over.
Exactly. Plus, Redfield gets the last word because he’s right (he’s trusting his eyes). Don’t worry, this thread will get killed too…
Trusting his eyes = a way for Sub9 to make himself feel good about never having any evidence.
Love the mental gymnastics. This is why I keep coming back. Huge ego boost.
29 -
David Morens, right hand man of Anthony Fauci, will testify tomorrow May 22, at a hearing of the Select Subcommittee on the Coronavirus Pandemic. Morens bragged about a method for deleting emails that rendered messages irretrievable after the "FOIA lady" showed him how.
93 -
2600 bro and Harambe 69ing at Motel 6 is a scene I'll never forget.
71 -
shot put wrote:
Is it only on this forum that people spell "discuss" with one s, or is this a new generational trend?
If it is the former, just because track and field is talked about here it doesn't mean that you have to drop a letter to make the word match an event.
get a brain moran
40 -
2600 bro wrote:
Because its fun to post?
Especially when morons assert consensus, spam the same low-effort posts, and never provide evidence. I enjoy the day-to-day of playing with anti-vaxxers.
Interesting take. Most people think you enjoy getting owned by senior citizens on a daily basis. Whatever helps you sleep at night
91 -
sad life wrote:
2600 bro wrote:
Because its fun to post?
Especially when morons assert consensus, spam the same low-effort posts, and never provide evidence. I enjoy the day-to-day of playing with anti-vaxxers.
Interesting take. Most people think you enjoy getting owned by senior citizens on a daily basis. Whatever helps you sleep at night
DanM and Unkle are characters. I enjoy listening to their ramblings. I consider it community service.
I have never been owned by evidence they presented (they’ve never presented evidence)Unkle did call me Faulkner after a typo on a long post I made. You could consider that an “own”
111 -
Big pharma/CDC will probably scrub his name from their records and claim he never worked for them. That's what they did to Jordon Walker when he admitted they manipulate viruses in a lab with the intent of making a vaccine that scores huge profits. They make the virus and the "cure." Great ponzi scheme. Time to wake up.
94 -
2600 bro wrote:
sad life wrote:
Interesting take. Most people think you enjoy getting owned by senior citizens on a daily basis. Whatever helps you sleep at night
DanM and Unkle are characters. I enjoy listening to their ramblings. I consider it community service.
I have never been owned by evidence they presented (they’ve never presented evidence)Unkle did call me Faulkner after a typo on a long post I made. You could consider that an “own”
That's exactly what I'd say if I was getting owned by senior citizens on a daily basis.
81
What People Are Talking About On LetsRun