This can’t be determined because there is no way to objectively quantify “talent as a whole.” In other words, that’s a clown question, bro.
I think if I were to ask you who's more talented between you and Lebron James you could easily objectively quantify talent as a whole. Unless you're really that dense.
Which is better: a Mack truck, or a Ferrari? And I don't mean better at their particular job. I mean better in a general, nebulous sense that I'm not going to define.
Oh, and if you point out that this question doesn't make much sense, I'm going to get cranky.
Curry sorry. Basketball is just an incredibly sport. Requires a very acute nervous system. Curry probably could have been a great runner if he had wanted to go that route. Jakob is one of the best runners in the world, by default that makes him a great athlete. But not Curry caliber.
Like just about everyone else, Curry would suck at distance running.
It takes a lot more athletic ability to excel at basketball than running. I've known some really good runners (a 2:12 marathoner, for one) who were as awkward as h*ll.