That is a good workout if your base is good. Speed work is just the sweetener, I fear you might find more injuries than improvement if you go too track workout focused
Chasing the 80% for mere average-to-above-average mortals (not using PEDS) takes serious training and devotion. I came close a couple of years ago (hit a 20min conversion in a 4-mile race, and sun 20 in a 5k that was probably a bit short.). But that fitness is fleeting, without sticking to it. I think Charlie is suggesting a lifestyle devotion (3hrs/day aerobic exercise to stay there), so enjoy the process if possible.
That said, if I go back to chasing the 80% again, I’m a little more inclined to reps on the track, rather than big miles, although the latter approach might extend fitness out to a 10k or Half.
Hobbyjogski, I like that idea of 3/5 miles at 7:00/7:30
I never ran in HS or college so I do not some basics that others may know and I train alone
I didn’t have collegiate training either, and train alone, as well. I learned a fair amount from devoted research when I attempted the 80% a couple of years ago, when turning 60.
My Garmin says my VO2 max is 46 superior. Top 5% if thats worth anything.
I will look up Cooper
My Garmin says 55, and gives a 5k estimate of 19:32, yet I’d probably be pressed to break 21min on a legit course. (I’m your age, BTW.) I think Charlie is around 65yrs.
Does your Garmin give "fitness age"? mine says 20 though my hairline does not agree
That is a good workout if your base is good. Speed work is just the sweetener, I fear you might find more injuries than improvement if you go too track workout focused
Chasing the 80% for mere average-to-above-average mortals (not using PEDS) takes serious training and devotion. I came close a couple of years ago (hit a 20min conversion in a 4-mile race, and sun 20 in a 5k that was probably a bit short.). But that fitness is fleeting, without sticking to it. I think Charlie is suggesting a lifestyle devotion (3hrs/day aerobic exercise to stay there), so enjoy the process if possible.
That said, if I go back to chasing the 80% again, I’m a little more inclined to reps on the track, rather than big miles, although the latter approach might extend fitness out to a 10k or Half.
Lol, the Parker Valby approach would probably suit me physically best, but I’m not yet inclined to going back to the gym and hitting aerobic machines several hours a week.
My Garmin says 55, and gives a 5k estimate of 19:32, yet I’d probably be pressed to break 21min on a legit course. (I’m your age, BTW.) I think Charlie is around 65yrs.
Does your Garmin give "fitness age"? mine says 20 though my hairline does not agree
I think I have to open Garmin connect for that, no?
Garmin (for me) seems to give overly optimistic 5k estimates if sessions are made up of faster reps, rather than mileage-slogs.
Sounds like I’ll have to get Garmin connect for that.
When I started back up during the COVID year, and went after the 80%, I brought into the mix a janky foot/ankle. It’s much better now, though still not 100%
I was in my low 50’s the first time I broke 20. I looked up my track times back then. I’d recently done a 4x1600 with 2:40 jog recovery in about a 6:12 average.
Almost 40 year old Mom of four kids 8 and under.. recently ran a 5K pushing the single stroller in 28:00 ( I know, it’s slow… roast me now)….but, in my prime ran 18:56.. so there’s some semi talent t...
All reps are timed rolling-start. At start of each rep, I chose to immediately go into a breathing cadence (per step) of 2-breaths-out/1-in (well above threshold breathing.)
A couple of weeks ago I surmised maybe I could break 24:00. Two days ago, I suspected maybe I could break 22:00. Currently, 21:45 might be possible. (I said 21:00 earlier in the thread, but that is probably too optimistic.)
Intelligent and highly flexible training plans for runners of all abilities. Free and paid subscriptions. Integrates with all major sports watches and apps.
I was doing a lot of 5 x 1k at 4:05 ish with 90 seconds/200m recoveries when I first broke 20 in my mid-late 50s. When I was averaging 4:00 or faster without too much difficulty I was able to break 19:30.
Wow, I just discovered a thread I started (under the handle ‘cool story bro’) that is exactly three years old to-the-day, in which Garmin stuff is discussed (as well as the McMillan workout mentioned):
Backstory: 59 yr-old male. It’s been several years since I’ve run consistently, let alone ‘competitively’. After getting to the point of becoming very de-conditioned this past year, I started consistently training again ov...
I was doing a lot of 5 x 1k at 4:05 ish with 90 seconds/200m recoveries when I first broke 20 in my mid-late 50s. When I was averaging 4:00 or faster without too much difficulty I was able to break 19:30.
I've done 3 x 1 mile workouts in the past, with a 5 minute walk recovery, and was able to hit slightly faster than 5k race pace (without burying myself).
I think you'll need to get those miles down to 6:25 (or slightly faster) to give yourself a shot.