1 year since Shelby Ban: What have we learned?

Along those lines, we have also learned that the AIU still gives out secret bans, and that an athlete under a secret provisional ban is to still allowed to train with their team.

We have learned that Shelby does not take responsibility for her actions.

From the looks of this thread, we are learning that the Shelby shills and apologists have mostly given up.

I think this also affects other mee-mee-mees. No, I will not buy the crap they promote. One would have to wonder when brands will get this message and stop supporting all athletes.

Her so called records would certainly have to be brought under the magnifying lens.

What I've had confirmed is that LR is full of basement-dwelling, namby-pambys that moan on and on about how evil Shelby is and how holier-than-thou they personally are about so-called PED use.

WISE UP - The history of athletics is REPLETE with PED use...all the way from the ancient Greeks till now. There's NEVER been a period where championships were won without some type of aid. Unfortunately, most of you juvenilles want to carry on your holy war about so-called "purity" of performance, destroying anything and everyone that gets in your way of the so-called "pure" athlete.

That the rules are very complicated and the vast majority who have been sounding of with their judgements have never read them in any regards.

This is not to mean that she is innocent or otherwise just that the rules need to be read.

With a magnifying glass, the font used for her times will seem bigger, but the ARs cannot be retroactively taken from her.

I have nothing to add, but I do appreciate your use of hyphens and the word "replete".

You may have spoken prematurely. As other threads have shown, there is no end to the posts from the usual suspects insisting Houlihan is not a "doper" and certainly not an "intentional" doper. I am sure they will find their way here. Their views won't have changed.

post.spmailtechn.com

First athlete to fall foul of Rodchenkov Anti-Doping Act banned

@insidethegames

Sabina Allen has been sentenced to a four-year period of ineligibility by the United States Anti-Doping Agency after testing positive for two banned s...

Link:http://post.spmailtechn.com/f/a/VZcAR9...

This is what a doping offence should be looking like in this age of whereabouts etc .

And, right on cue, here is liar soorer. "The rules, the rules!..."

The main thing I learned is how dilisional some people are and how they keep defending people found guilty after losing all appeals.

I also learned how many weird autistics visit this site and oarse ever word to try and confirm their bias. A great example is pretending the ruling didn't indicate she cheated when that is exactly whaylt it indicates even without an exact word. Anyone that thinks she didn't cheat at this point is mentally handicapped.

You can make your own assumptions but that she cheated or not was never tested at the hearing esp as the rules exclude such evaluations.

The panel has to parse each word of the rules; rules you have failed to read along with the decision.

When you have demonstrated that you understand the rules you may not feel confident to insult.