Interesting: British hammer thrower banned for 4 years after missing 1, not 3 tests

whaaaa!!!!!!!

none of your winging 'points' make any sense, michelin woman.

but lie to yourself if you must. not me though!

just know that despite your repulsive entitlement when you break the rules occasionally there may be consequences. 'tiny lie' lol. numbskull

casual obsever wrote:

Only if you believe the liar. A "subversion of the doping control process" is a serious violation, and again, missing one test on purpose (test evasion a la not opening the door for example, or running away in the airport) is enough for a sanction, which is often forgotten here.

The three strike rule is only for inadvertently missed tests.

If only he had blamed his doorbell ....

321boom wrote:

whaaaa!!!!!!!

none of your winging 'points' make any sense, michelin woman.

but lie to yourself if you must. not me though!

just know that despite your repulsive entitlement when you break the rules occasionally there may be consequences. 'tiny lie' lol. numbskull

Dear Other Illiterate.

I am not a bird and thus do not do any winging.

Yes, there are consequences of a lie but proportionality would suggest not a four year ban.

Or, being an illiterate, do you remain bewildered with the word proportionality?

do all imbeciles where you're from yammer like that or are you a special kind of imbecile?

oh right, you're a delusional anglotrashian. duh. you probably don't even realize how pathetically obnoxious you come accross. especially while rambling such stupid nonsense.

I should appreciate my superiority more instead of taking it for granted. I'm so lucky to not be you. I'm so so very lucky to be better than you.

now enough defecating on you and onto something important. let me explain it in even simpler terms for you, dimwit, since you're clearly too dumb to understand what normal people don't even need explained:

when you lie about your location and run away to be unreachable it's not some weird little nothing you dumb trash. they caught you on a bad day and you need a little more time to let drugs become untraceable. and that's why you must be banned.

pretty sure these sentences are too long and complicated for you though lol

trollism wrote:

El Keniano wrote:

They're desperate to show their teeth to overcompensate for UK Anti-Doping's abysmal and absurd (read zero) bust rate.

So countless Kenyan busts are concrete proof of rampant British doping, and now a harsh ban on a British athlete is also concrete proof of British doping?

Brilliant as ever from the bad mama.

Hi Coevett!

321boom wrote:

uughhh... you poor dumb old yenta. despised and shunned by everyone you used to know.

media1.tenor.com/images/fe14cd6cd2b077489f4d112aa8b87d62/tenor.gif

so inferior you're just harping the same lame nonsense over and over... yikes. begging me to stop berating you cause you can't retort properly. pffft

look, numbnuts: if your fellow inferior britbong hadn't made up a nonsense story in order to hide he'd need to just avoid getting caught another 2 times in a year. instead, he was taking drugs and wasn't going to be tested negative that day, needed more time, hence the hiding so far away and lying, imbecile.

go at least get your disgusting teeth fixed cause mentally you're beyond help.

btw what's a 'key board', illiterate imbecile?

The appeal panels ,containing a full range of educated fine brains, have stated the ban is excessive but they had no option under the rules.

The first hearing cleared him.

Not too complicated I would assume for a person, even one, demonstrating a remarkable puerile mind.

Have you bothered to read the judgements ?

'cleared him but had no option' lol... just another deranged winge from psycho yenta, nbd

do you really think you make your mental gymnastics sound sensible? danketty dank da-dank-a dankdank

there was a decision to do nothing, but probably fearing an outcry for letting a clear cheater get away the other body put the rules on him. I mean, you know, the guy DID run far away and LIE when there would be absolutely NO REASON to if you've got nothing to hide. he does. bye, doper!

btw have you made a dentist's appointment yet, psycho?

321boom wrote:

'cleared him but had no option' lol... just another deranged winge from psycho yenta, nbd

do you really think you make your mental gymnastics sound sensible? danketty dank da-dank-a dankdank

there was a decision to do nothing, but probably fearing an outcry for letting a clear cheater get away the other body put the rules on him. I mean, you know, the guy DID run far away and LIE when there would be absolutely NO REASON to if you've got nothing to hide. he does. bye, doper!

btw have you made a dentist's appointment yet, psycho?

It was accepted that he lied to avoid a missed test.

Have you bothered to read the decisions ?

The panels are highly qualified independent professionals; to think they would be frightened is as outlandish as your literacy is that of a sub species.

lol just because you don't have a reputation to protect doesn't mean others don't. antidoping needs to be seen as 'fighting' doping you imbecile. his 'reason' for lying is nonsensical like every post your inferior self made here, but I've already explained, imbecile. thankfully they eventualy came to the correct conclusion like me. noone lies and runs innocently, imbecile. but you're tryingbto put some value on the discarded wrong decision, hmmm, almost like you're a pathetic inferior britshit jones, imbecile. feeling entitled to break rules monkey ass yenta. disgusting worthless subhuman.

so have you made a dentist's appointment yet, inferior dna trash?

321boom wrote:

lol just because you don't have a reputation to protect doesn't mean others don't. antidoping needs to be seen as 'fighting' doping you imbecile. his 'reason' for lying is nonsensical like every post your inferior self made here, but I've already explained, imbecile. thankfully they eventualy came to the correct conclusion like me. noone lies and runs innocently, imbecile. but you're tryingbto put some value on the discarded wrong decision, hmmm, almost like you're a pathetic inferior britshit jones, imbecile. feeling entitled to break rules monkey ass yenta. disgusting worthless subhuman.

so have you made a dentist's appointment yet, inferior dna trash?

Have you bothered to read the decisions or even note who was on the panels and their reputation in antidoping?

The conclusion they came to was that a four year ban was not reasonable.

And my teeth are wonderfully in order; more than can be said of your appalling grammar and syntax.

damn mark dry, you really had me believing you're some lonely annoying old yenta. look, I respect pro athletes a lot, but you have to admit- the way you ran as far as possible while still being 'explainable' is weird. you must have known that 1 absence is nothing. just take it, it's meaningless, and get back asap to take your test. but you're out there letting these drugs air out, making up stories like... btw are you saying the other body, the one that found you guilty, is made up of more corrupt schmucks than the first one? who are they? the way you're replying with questions instead of just saying stuff makes you look like you don't know what you're talking about, just trying to make it look like you have some 'point'. either state it clearly or don't say anything.

It was accepted that he lied to avoid a missed test

uhh yeah, pretty accepted. hence the correct decision that you were trying to subvert the process. duh. what point were trying to make with that?

Your illiterate rant continues.

It has become so sub literate that I fail to understand your thinking.But perhaps thinking and reading are matters that you have no comprehension of?

Anyway, it is evident that you have failed to read the decisions of the hearings.

The point being that the penalty was disproportionate.

That is such a long word but I would hope a word that your nursery school attendant would help your painfully uneducated mind comprehend.

imbecile of inferior species, worthless anglotrash subhuman, you keep gargling the same lame illogical bs and providing no value of any kind (just like irl, ay). you do it all to convince yourself that your iq isn't far below mine and yet this is all you come up with? lol. you keep dodging when called out on your bs and can't even make a point, only some roundabout blabber that's supposed to imply sth that's not actually true at all. lol. pathetic beaten down little victim. hahaha! doper. cheat. criminal.

321boom wrote:

imbecile of inferior species, worthless anglotrash subhuman, you keep gargling the same lame illogical bs and providing no value of any kind (just like irl, ay). you do it all to convince yourself that your iq isn't far below mine and yet this is all you come up with? lol. you keep dodging when called out on your bs and can't even make a point, only some roundabout blabber that's supposed to imply sth that's not actually true at all. lol. pathetic beaten down little victim. hahaha! doper. cheat. criminal.

Have you bothered to read the decisions yet?

Reading to understand is a skill that tends to follow maturity.

Have you worked out what proportionality means yet or has your keeper been too involved in cutting up your food for you?

hahaha thanks for another non-answer, you've proven long ago that you're just a clown here for my amusement. weirdo.

now go READ my previous comments, try to COMPREHEND them (lol gon be harrrddd ay) and stop avoiding my questions, delusional goofball.

then go back to talking to yourself cause no one likes you, shunned little nobody

Ukad chief executive Nicole Sapstead said Dry's offence was "a serious breach" and "undermines the anti-doping process which athletes and the public depend on to have confidence in clean sport".

I do feel bad for you mark in the case that somehow this is just a big flustercuck. don't believe it myself. just too shady, you even involved your gf in lying about 'fishing' instead of just saying you were with your parents. why?

if you're clean (unlikely) maybe launch a kickstarter for about $2k and get an extensive lie detector test. they can be beaten but the ones that take several hours are really hard and passing would give public good reason to believe you

321boom wrote:

I do feel bad for you mark in the case that somehow this is just a big flustercuck. don't believe it myself. just too shady, you even involved your gf in lying about 'fishing' instead of just saying you were with your parents. why?

if you're clean (unlikely) maybe launch a kickstarter for about $2k and get an extensive lie detector test. they can be beaten but the ones that take several hours are really hard and passing would give public good reason to believe you

Somewhat improved English , congratulations.

Why a lie detector as the lie has been admitted?

Have you read the decisions yet?

Have you grasped the concept of proportionality yet?

heh... oh you poor remorseless druggie. bucktooth swamp thing.

the PURPOSE of your lying is in question you dumdum. of course you lied, so did your ho at your request, lil dumdum. we know that, duh, no one believes your bs excuses. that's... what your whole rambling is about, dumdum, isn't it? how stupid are you?

why do you keep dodging my questions, imbecile?

deflection with nonsense doesn't work if I keep shytting on you, which I'm happy to. can you come up with anything else? no? well then, nice job making yourself look even worse than before this thread, dumdum.