Enter your shoe size
Providing your shoe size lets us help you find the best shoes you can buy right now.
ASICS GT-2000 1
Overall Grades And Reviews
How This Shoe Compares To Its Competitors
- Bottom 25% out of 1,612 shoes with reader reviews
- Bottom 25% out of 1,610 shoes designed for everyday
- Bottom 25% out of 178 stability pronation control shoes
- 193rd out of 221 shoes made by ASICS
Pros
-
One of the most popular shoes among LetsRun.com readers.
-
Rated among the top 25% of shoes on durability.
Cons
-
Several of reviewers reported getting injured in this shoe.
-
Reviewers rate this shoe worse than the ASICS GT 2000 12.
-
Rated below average overall.
-
Rated among the bottom 10% of shoes on comfort.
-
Rated below average on cushioning.
LetsRun.com Reviewer Ratings
Overall Ratings Breakdown
| 10 |
17%
|
| 9 |
17%
|
| 8 |
39%
|
| 7 |
24%
|
| 6 |
2%
|
| ≤ 5 |
0%
|
- LRC Grade
- 8.4
- Average Review
- 8.2
- Median Review
- 8.0
- LRC Grade
- 8.5
- Average Review
- 8.3
- Median Review
- 8.0
- LRC Grade
- 8.6
- Average Review
- 0.0
- Median Review
- 0.0
- LRC Grade
- 8.3
- Average Review
- 8.1
- Median Review
- 8.0
- LRC Grade
- 7.3
- Average Review
- 7.0
- Median Review
- 7.0
- LRC Grade
- 8.0
- Average Review
- 7.8
- Median Review
- 8.0
Score Distribution
| 10 |
17%
|
| 9 |
17%
|
| 8 |
39%
|
| 7 |
24%
|
| 6 |
2%
|
| ≤ 5 |
0%
|
Score Distribution
| 10 |
17%
|
| 9 |
26%
|
| 8 |
30%
|
| 7 |
17%
|
| 6 |
9%
|
| ≤ 5 |
0%
|
Score Distribution
| 10 |
0%
|
| 9 |
0%
|
| 8 |
0%
|
| 7 |
0%
|
| 6 |
0%
|
| ≤ 5 |
100%
|
Score Distribution
| 10 |
20%
|
| 9 |
15%
|
| 8 |
35%
|
| 7 |
20%
|
| 6 |
7%
|
| ≤ 5 |
4%
|
Score Distribution
| 10 |
7%
|
| 9 |
15%
|
| 8 |
24%
|
| 7 |
22%
|
| 6 |
11%
|
| ≤ 5 |
22%
|
Score Distribution
| 10 |
15%
|
| 9 |
24%
|
| 8 |
24%
|
| 7 |
15%
|
| 6 |
9%
|
| ≤ 5 |
13%
|
Shoe Comparison
|
ASICS GT-2000 1
|
ASICS GT 2000 12
|
ASICS Novablast 5
|
Brooks Adrenaline GTS 24
|
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Image |
This Shoe
|
Newer Version
|
Top Rated Trainer For Sale
|
Most Comfortable Trainer For Sale
|
| Shoe Properties | ||||
| Shoe Type |
Trainer
|
Trainer
|
Trainer
|
Trainer
|
| Pronation Control |
Stability
|
Moderate Stability
|
|
|
| Weight |
|
9.5 oz. (men's), 8.3 oz. (women's)
|
|
|
| Stack Height |
|
35mm.
|
|
|
| Forefoot Height |
|
27mm.
|
|
|
| Drop Height |
|
8 mm.
|
|
|
| Shoe Released |
2013
|
Q3 2023
|
Q4 2024
|
Q4 2024
|
| MSRP |
|
$138
|
|
$140
|
|
LRC Ratings
Out of 10
|
||||
| Overall |
8.4
|
8.6
|
8.7
|
8.6
|
| Comfort |
8.5
|
8.8
|
8.7
|
8.7
|
| Cushioning |
8.6
|
8.3
|
8.2
|
8.6
|
| Durability |
8.3
|
8.3
|
8.0
|
7.7
|
| Appearance |
7.3
|
7.9
|
8.3
|
8.4
|
| Value |
8.0
|
8.2
|
7.9
|
7.9
|
Reader Reviews
-
ASICS GT-2000 1 Review
30 miles per week, high arches- Overall
- 7.0
- Comfort
- 6.0
- Durability
- 8.0
- Appearance
- 5.0
- Value
- 9.0
This was a pretty good shoe but not as good as the Asics GT-2000 and no where near the Cumulus but for price they did okay.
-
ASICS GT-2000 1 Review
30 miles per week, overpronator, low arches- Overall
- 8.0
- Comfort
- 8.0
- Durability
- 7.0
- Appearance
- 7.0
- Value
- 8.0
This shoe satisfactorily met my needs. I primarily ran on roads with this shoe with occasional runs on groomed trails. I experienced no problems or difficulties with this shoe.
-
ASICS GT-2000 1 Review
25 miles per week, overpronator, medium arches- Overall
- 7.0
- Comfort
- 8.0
- Durability
- 5.0
- Appearance
- 8.0
- Value
- 6.0
Comfortable, fairly light show. Has deteriorated faster than I had hoped.
-
ASICS GT-2000 1 Review
60 miles per week, neutral pronator, low arches- Overall
- 6.0
- Comfort
- 10.0
- Durability
- 7.0
- Appearance
- 1.0
- Value
- 10.0
I have worn this shoe for training purposes for the last 7 years (Formerly the 2100 series). I have never been injured. I think that the shoe is a bit heavy and bulky, but excellent for regular runs. Not impressed with the colors, this shoe does not seem to be keeping up with the trends of making shoes bright and neat looking.
-
ASICS GT-2000 1 Review
50 miles per week, overpronator, low arches- Overall
- 7.0
- Comfort
- 7.0
- Durability
- 7.0
- Appearance
- 5.0
- Value
- 5.0
It's been a typically fine running shoe.
-
ASICS GT-2000 1 Review
15 miles per week, overpronator, high arches- Overall
- 9.0
- Comfort
- 9.0
- Durability
- 8.0
- Appearance
- 9.0
- Value
- 9.0
Works for me - netural, stable, durabe
-
ASICS GT-2000 1 Review
Overpronator, medium arches- Overall
- 9.0
- Comfort
- 9.0
- Durability
- 8.0
- Appearance
- 7.0
- Value
- 9.0
Great stability and duarable for endureance runs.
-
ASICS GT-2000 1 Review
40 miles per week, overpronator, low arches- Overall
- 7.0
- Comfort
- 7.0
- Durability
- 7.0
- Appearance
- 8.0
- Value
- 5.0
Overall I've been pretty happy with the shoe. I'm ramping up my mileage after a long hiatus. I have some lingering knee pain, which could be due in part to these shoes being wrong for me.. The shoes I religiously wore throughout college (New Balance 850 series) appear to be discontinued.
-
ASICS GT-2000 1 Review
16 miles per week, overpronator, low arches- Overall
- 8.0
- Comfort
- 8.0
- Durability
- 7.0
- Appearance
- 8.0
- Value
- 8.0
Very comfortable and light. Provides enough stability for my mid-pronation.
-
ASICS GT-2000 1 Review
35 miles per week, overpronator, high arches- Overall
- 10.0
- Comfort
- 8.0
- Durability
- 10.0
- Appearance
- 9.0
- Value
- 5.0
I had to get Super Feet due to a weakness in the mid foot. Other than that, it's great.