10 |
44%
|
9 |
6%
|
8 |
31%
|
7 |
6%
|
6 |
6%
|
≤ 5 |
6%
|
10 |
44%
|
9 |
6%
|
8 |
31%
|
7 |
6%
|
6 |
6%
|
≤ 5 |
6%
|
10 |
44%
|
9 |
19%
|
8 |
31%
|
7 |
0%
|
6 |
6%
|
≤ 5 |
0%
|
10 |
31%
|
9 |
13%
|
8 |
38%
|
7 |
0%
|
6 |
19%
|
≤ 5 |
0%
|
10 |
25%
|
9 |
13%
|
8 |
31%
|
7 |
13%
|
6 |
13%
|
≤ 5 |
6%
|
10 |
13%
|
9 |
25%
|
8 |
25%
|
7 |
25%
|
6 |
6%
|
≤ 5 |
6%
|
10 |
25%
|
9 |
13%
|
8 |
38%
|
7 |
19%
|
6 |
0%
|
≤ 5 |
6%
|
I have been running in Ravennas since they were introduced. The newer version seems lighter and more responsive.
I always look for a show with some support. Ravennas have been great shoes. Perfect for marathon training, tempo runs. Even light enough to wear during a marathon.
Good for training, don't seem slow enough to avoid racing in
Have always used Ravennas for years, but extremely disappointed with the 10’s. Pricing was consistently at MSRP on multiple sites ($109.95). The shoe was what I expected, but durability was an issue. Two pairs had the same issue with the mesh outer layer tearing above the brooks logo on the outer of the shoe. Shoe completely blew out within a week after tear started. Got about 45 days and 175 miles out of them.
The feel and fit of this shoe was great. It seemed to wear out a little faster than some, but not in a significant amount. Very solid middle-stability shoe.
Have just about worked my way through these shoes, with around 1000km on the clock. They have a great cushion, and very comfortable for both quicker short distances and longer runs.
They do feel slightly bulky, however this is compensated for with the comfort levels.
All in all a very good shoe, and would buy again.
The Ravenna 10 is a good shoe, but not a great shoe. I like that it is lighter weight and still provides some support, however, I feel like it was too firm for me personally. I somewhat overpronate and found that the Adrenaline GTS work better for me than the Ravenna. That being said, I still had some good training phases in them and was able to leverage the Ravenna in many different types of running activities, like speed work on the track to long runs on dirt paths. I got about 450 miles out of the shows before I felt like I needed to retire them.
I usually have 3-4 different shoes in my rotation. Ravenna is the one constant. Since it first came on the market, I've found it to be the combination of support without too much weight that I need to train and race well. If I had to narrow down to one shoe, this would be it.
Love the weight to the Ravenna line. Started as a Brooks Ghost shoe runner and finally found the Ravenna 9 to be much lighter and faster. The 10s are even lighter and faster than the 9s. Will always have the Ravenna's in my running arsenal!
and compare notes
The Ravenna 10 has been a great trainer for me when I'm off the trail. It's a nice change to have more support. They were a bit pricey, but I'm the type to put in a little extra cash for comfort. Looking forward to these lasting a while.
I have used different Ravenna models for the past 5 years. I have found way less frequent nicks and pains in my lower legs with these shoes. Their durability is a little better than other shoes I have used (i.e. Nike) but obviously nowhere close to Hoka's (though their shoes appear to be substantial outliers).