local lib wrote:
I followed the debate a little bit last night.
I didn't notice much (if any?) talk about collusion and impeachment. Then again, I didn't follow the debate too closely.
It's frustrating that democrats are talking about what they would do to defeat Trump when all signs point towards the fact there was collusion of some kind.
If there wasn't collusion, what was the purpose of the meetings with Russians at Trump tower in 2016?
Come on. There must have been some collusion.
That's why this democratic debate is difficult to take seriously.
The democratic nominees are not FBI investigators. How do you expect them to speak to the collusion investigation? What purpose would you expect that discussion to serve?
The Mueller investigation looked at conspiracy (not collusion though they are similar). Mueller concluded NO CONSPIRACY. None whatsoever. So enough - the Mueller report exonerated Trump 100%.