Roderick Powell wrote:
Compare FM's anomalies with say 20 random runners. This makes them as circumstantial evidence goes-overwhelming. When FM is virtually the only one to miss these mats, and have these funny splits...that is strong evidence. You could probably use technology to actually determine from FM's running itself----just how fast he is going--that would be strong evidence.
Technology? WTF is that supposed to mean? Mathematics and statistics are the toosl to use along with a computer and a spreadsheet program to make it faster. You would have needed to have paid attention during 8th and 9th grade to figure it out. Crawl back into your hole grandpa.
In case you have Alzheimer's I would apologize to you, but you wouldn't remember that anyway.