You are reporting the following post to the moderators for review and possible removal from the forum

Roderick Powell
RE: Frank Meza 2:53:10 at LA Marathon (70 years old) unoffical time (just finished)

FrankMezaTrump wrote:


Cheat Meal wrote:


maybe this wrote:

The 2016 Oakland marathon is an interesting case.

Here's video from the start line:
http://www.ktvu.com/morning-news/110426161-video

#135 on the start line finished with a chip time almost the same as FM. But FM started 1:47 after the gun went off. The video shows what that means. The fast runners take off (at 2:41 in the linked video). The slow runners take off. People wearing banana costumes take off. Walkers get going. The street is literally empty - the sweeper bicycle is disappearing in the distance at 4:00. Why would the sweeper bike start if someone was still on the starting line? The video ends at 4:10, 7 seconds before FM crosses the start line. According to the results, FM ran the first 10K split in 39:47, going through nearly 700 joggers and walkers at a pace of 6:25/mile.


This is great work.

What would be great, if someone had the time to do it, would be to compile a list of every known "Frank Anomaly", and write everything down in a single document. Just the facts, with sources (links to race results, photos, etc.). Waiting by the sidewalk, cutting off bib bottom, starting late, finishing fast, never appearing at mid-race photos or videos, covering his bib during pictures, giving his bib to his sister-in-law, carrying his timing chip around his wrist, DQs at CIM, retired doctor vs. manager of 100+ doctors, track scholarship or no track scholarship, etc., etc. There are so many red flags around FM, but many of them are spread around the 180 pages of this thread. I think if everything was compiled into a single document in a just-the-fact fashion, that document could be provided to a journalist/reporter and he/she could go from there.



I would pony up to a gofundme for someone. Actually, probably only derek from marathon investigation since he has street cred to do just that. Derek, you do that and I'll give plenty. This guy is the worst cheat in history:


What would be great, if someone had the time to do it, would be to compile a list of every known "Frank Anomaly", and write everything down in a single document. Just the facts, with sources (links to race results, photos, etc.). Waiting by the sidewalk, cutting off bib bottom, starting late, finishing fast, never appearing at mid-race photos or videos, covering his bib during pictures, giving his bib to his sister-in-law, carrying his timing chip around his wrist, DQs at CIM, retired doctor vs. manager of 100+ doctors, track scholarship or no track scholarship, etc., etc. There are so many red flags around FM, but many of them are spread around the 180 pages of this thread. I think if everything was compiled into a single document in a just-the-fact fashion, that document could be provided to a journalist/reporter and he/she could go from there.[/quote]

Please do this, it would be exhaustive. Compare FM's anomalies with say 20 random runners. This makes them as circumstantial evidence goes-overwhelming. When FM is virtually the only one to miss these mats, and have these funny splits...that is strong evidence. You could probably use technology to actually determine from FM's running itself----just how fast he is going--that would be strong evidence. After all speed is simply stride rate and stride cadence. I think on strava that performance measurents of your running are measured. We could perhaps prove through that means how fast FM is going. DR. Phillip Bland, FM's friend and Coach Diaz seem to want to put the burden on the accusers. They, and FM through his unwillingness to show us how fast he can go....are demanding irrefutable proof. They keep pushing that notion, and irrefutable proof will turn up sooner or later. The Meza "camp" are doing everything to keep the word "if" in the conversation.

Hit the submit button below if you want us to review the post.

If you feel this is urgent or want a reply, email us at [email protected] about the post and please include a link to the thread the post is on and what page number/post on that page it is.