You already have him on the ropes and he's grasping for straws. Lol. You easily outwit every time and he knows this. It's so funny to see him backpedaling and using the wordplay game (e.g. "I actually didn't say that but was refering to what someone else said" or "you took my statement out of context...I was talking about another aspect of the case that you can't comprehend).
casual obsever wrote:
In fact, you just agreed with me when saying ""about there being no evidence for her doping in Boston".
Lame try. I wrote "you trolled about there being no evidence for her doping in Boston".
I said "no evidence" that the "IAAF claimed that she was already doping for Boston"
Yes you did. And that was a straight lie. As per usual.
Rekrunner is the master of wordplay & diversionary tactics.