You are reporting the following post to the moderators for review and possible removal from the forum

Anon
RE: USATF Announces 2020 Olympic Trials Marathon qualifying standards
A few weeks ago, I watched the long course swimming championships. For many years, the US has had A, B, and C finals. The C finals are for younger athletes. The B finals are for the athletes who placed 9 through 16 (based on time) during the preliminary rounds. The A final is for the top 8 qualifiers. The top 2 finishers from the A final qualified for the Worlds team in each individual event.

During the TV broadcast, Rowdy Gaines made the point that the B and C finals are a good way of giving championship level experience to younger athletes and athletes not quite ready to make the world team. The US team is incredibly difficult to make in swimming – only the top two go to worlds or the Olympics in individual events, and our team is so good that getting one of those spots is a tall order (esp with people like Katie Ledecky in her prime). Having what are essentially developmental finals gives developing athletes a path towards elite competition.

I recognize that the marathon is a different beast vs. the half. I also appreciate that swimmers in the finals got there by doing the event during the preliminary rounds -- you don't make the final in the 800 free by swimming a fast 400. But I still wonder whether allowing half qualifiers into the marathon trials might be a good developmental step for athletes who are not quite ready to run a full during the window. I get that athletes with half qualifying times might flame out during the actual trials. Personally, I am OK with that, especially if it gives a talented athlete an opportunity to learn and grow, and hopefully come back.

Hit the submit button below if you want us to review the post.

If you feel this is urgent or want a reply, email us at [email protected] about the post and please include a link to the thread the post is on and what page number/post on that page it is.