Worth 18 wrote:
[quote]Precious Roy wrote:
Sub 20 for women is probably closer to 17 for men. I live in a huge city and can count on both hand the number of women who run sub 20 in town who were not scholarship athletes in college.
Sub 20 for women is not like sub 17 for men, physiologically. It's much more like 18, women's running just isn't as deep. The men's and women's world records are just over 90 seconds apart, no reason a woman should be 3 minutes slower than an equivalent performance for a man when the top women are only half that far away.[/quote]
Definitely. Non elite women simply don't train or try as hard as a rule. Men always have a higher degree of wanting to demonstrate physical prowess on average.[/quote]
Thanks for that super-important PSA. Can we now get back to helping this nice woman with her training?