You are reporting the following post to the moderators for review and possible removal from the forum

Not optimal

Jcjc wrote:

[quote]Not optimal wrote:

Experience running the 800m, wealth of evidence about the fastest performances ever, the word of great elites such as Coe, the physiology of the event backed up by research.

You NEED to get slower.

None of those things are reliable sources of information. All of those things are nonscientific and anecdotal. Does needing to get slower really make sense to you? In all other events, slowing down means you mispaced yourself.[/quote]
The physiology of the event backed up by research is non-scientific to you?
Here is some research and math modelling of the event for you:

A simple model of entropy accumulation suggests that for any reasonable relation between entropy generation and speed, the optimal race strategy is to run the rst half of the race faster than the second. Such a strategy causes the entropy density gradient across the boundary of the working muscle to take on a large value early in the race, which increases the entropy eux. That this is in fact the optimal race strategy is proven by the overwhelming preponderance of positive-split races in the set of world records for one-lap and two-lap races.

Source: Optimal Pacing for Running 400 m and 800 m Track Races James Reardon University of Wisconsin{Madison, Department of Physics, Madison, WI 53706 (Dated: April 3, 2012)

It is not annecdotal to say that every world record ever set in the event has a slower second lap. That is called evidence.

It might also be of note to you that this calculator trackbot has hijacked was never designed for the 800m. So the owner and creator knows it does not work for the 800m. So don't bother using it for that.

Hit the submit button below if you want us to review the post.

If you feel this is urgent or want a reply, email us at [email protected] about the post and please include a link to the thread the post is on and what page number/post on that page it is.