You are reporting the following post to the moderators for review and possible removal from the forum

Another giver of +1
RE: Congratulations: Ed Whitlock Gets NY Times Feature

Ed at Work wrote:

[quote]Another giver of +1 wrote:

[quote]Ed at Work wrote:

But saying it "works" is a very hard thing to do with such a small sample size. Remember Ed is not actually improving which is how we generally tell if training is "working".

Also he does get injured. He takes whole years off at a time.


The reason Ed is not improving (year by year) is that he's at an age where natural physical decline is accelerating faster than any type of training can hope to overcome.

His training is "working" in that he's usually the fastest runner for his age as he ages.

I agree with Turbogeezer when he says you can reach 95% or more of your race potential off simple base mileage with regular short races being the only fast running. Not getting injured is the secret for older runners.[/quote]

Disagree. His physical decline is faster because he's training one dimensionally.[/quote]

Disagree. Two dimensionally - long slow training runs and short fast races. As mentioned above, his training for the M85 marathon wasn't ideal. If he'd run 3:45 the decline over the past 12 years wouldn't look so bad.

Hit the submit button below if you want us to review the post.

If you feel this is urgent or want a reply, email us at [email protected] about the post and please include a link to the thread the post is on and what page number/post on that page it is.