You are reporting the following post to the moderators for review and possible removal from the forum

Race detective
Revisiting old posts

Florida midtimer wrote:

Not sure if this one made it into the suspicious list, but Bayshore marathon 2008 - 2:55. ...

Also bayshore 2009, 2:52. ...


Yup. I first noted Bayshore 2008 as being suspicious back on 1/16/11 (bottom of p. 48). As well as Bayshore 2007 (2:55). Here's what I posted the next day (on p. 54):

'Date' 'Event' 'Gun Time' 'Chip Time' 'Difference' 'Overall Place' 'Key Suspicions'

5/24/08 Bayshore Marathon (MI) 2:57:07 2:55:10 0:01:57 26/1263 Long start delay; 1:23:27/1:31:42 splits -- 1st half faster than questionable PR at the time of 1:23:48 (Naples, FL)
http://results.active.com/pages/searchform.jsp?posted_p=t&numPerPage=50&rsID=64898&eventClass=Marathon&queryType=division&pubID=3

5/26/07 Bayshore Marathon (MI) 2:56:35 2:55:20 0:01:15 22/1294 Long start delay
http://results.active.com/pages/searchform.jsp?posted_p=t&numPerPage=25&page=1&rsID=45345&sex=M&queryType=division&pubID=3#VIEW

Is 1:15 a questionably long delay? For the 2007 Bayshore race, it means he started back with 4 and 5 hr finishers. And on another post I wrote on p. 54, I showed that prior to 2006, even in races with FAR more participants (>6700 finishers, for example, in the 2005 Crim 10M), he started only 13 sec back. So in Kip's case, I would say yes.

Mentioned it way back then, but worth mentioning here for newer readers: Kip's questionable race habits go back a long ways ... back to 2006. (Everything prior to then looks fine.)

Hit the submit button below if you want us to review the post.

If you feel this is urgent or want a reply, email us at [email protected] about the post and please include a link to the thread the post is on and what page number/post on that page it is.