You are reporting the following post to the moderators for review and possible removal from the forum

:|}
RE: MARY CAIN is easily the greatest running prodigy in the US since Mary Decker Slaney

Newport Richie wrote:
No, as a matter of fact, I don't. If you don't think that someone who can run in the 4:30's for a mile is incapable of a 17:20 5K, even with a relatively steep performance curve, then you are deluded. You are clearly operating from a position of having decided your conclusion in advance (Cuffe is a better distance runner than Cain) and scrambling to come up with evidence to support this. This is not making you look very smart.


Cuffe is clearly a better distance runner and I don't see how you can argue that Cain is better. Cuffe has destroyed Cain in XC and has a far greater 3000 PR. And as for my method of arguing, I first looked at the evidence, made my conclusion, and cited evidence to support my conclusion. If that's not a good method for arguing, then sorry. However, the fact is that Cain clearly has more speed than endurance. This is evidenced by her 2:03r 800, and her 9:28 3000. By your logic, if someone can run 4:30's for a mile, they should easily be running 9:15 for 3000. However, she ran 9:28, not 9:15. This shows that she doesn't have tremendous endurance. I agree that she can run 17:20 for a 5k NEXT YEAR, after she builds up some endurance over the summer along with her new speed. However, as of right now, Cain can't run anywhere near that for a 5k, meaning Cuffe has greater endurance, meaning that if Cuffe can barely break 10, then Cain probably can't.

Hit the submit button below if you want us to review the post.

If you feel this is urgent or want a reply, email us at [email protected] about the post and please include a link to the thread the post is on and what page number/post on that page it is.