You are reporting the following post to the moderators for review and possible removal from the forum
RE: LYDIARD OR DANIELS?
Nothing you say is relevant to the discussion of Lydiard/Daniels. All you do in your various incarnations is take discussions of the sport and trash them by your carrying on towards anyone who has some actual ideas or informations. Got any advice for the 51 year old who's starting back up? got any prefernce for Lydiard, Daniels, Higdon, Bowerman and any explanation for your preference that someone might find useful? What exactly are you "debating" here?
You've wanted to get under the skins of some of the serious posters here. Congratulations. You've succeeded. Keep it up and eventually a lot of us will probably let you "have" the thread expcept for suggesting to people who are asking serious questions or tossing out topics for discussion to go to the Lydiard Founadtions website or maybe to e-mail us privately and you can take satisfaction from thinking that you've "helped" get this Lydiard nonsense out of the running world. But of course Lydiard's place is well established and you're just another example of what arthur used to call the "Tall Poppy" syndrome, i.e. people who haven't accomplished anything and make themselves feel better about it by trashing people who have accomplished something. You might want to respond by saying you respect Lydiard but that's a crock. You don't respect someone by making it next to impossible to have a reasonable discussion about their work and ideas.
Hit the submit button below if you want us to review the post.