You are reporting the following post to the moderators for review and possible removal from the forum
The Not Unameless
RE: LYDIARD OR DANIELS?
Is "modified Lydiard" still Lydiard? When does it become so modified for "modern times" that we can and should stop calling it Lydiard? Is there any limit to this? Time and time again I've seen athletes and coaches saying "we are following Lydiard Principles" when THEY ARE NOT IN ANY WAY SHAPE OR FORM.
You are a good guy Craig. I like you. BUT IT'S 2008. WHAT ARE THE BEST DOING TODAY? (Hint: It isn't CLASSIC LYDIARD. And please, post me some January weeks of Maottram.)
I will get bashed for "bashing Lydiard". But I'm NOT bashing Lydiard. He contributed immensely. So did the Beatles to music. So did Da Vinci to art. So did Edison to science. Are we to look to those great people in 2008 for the most up to date contributions?
Let's BUILD ON LYDIARD. WAKE UP NORTH AMERICA.
History is very important for seeing where we are now/today.
Hit the submit button below if you want us to review the post.