World Famous Message Board Message Board Podcast
What's LetsRun.com? Contact Us Advertise on LetsRun.com
Shop Subscribe
Sign In
Running's Homepage
Message Board World Famous Message Board Podcast
What's LetsRun.com? Contact Us Advertise on LetsRun.com
Shop Subscribe
  • New Messageboard
Sign In
  • LetsRun.com Account
    • Sign In
    • Register Account
  • LetsRun.com Supporters Club
    • Join
  • Homepage
    • Today's Homepage
  • World Famous Message Board
    • Main Forum
    • Training Forum
    • College Forum
    • High School Forum
    • Shoes & Gear
  • LetsRun.com Podcast
    • Apple Podcasts
    • Google Podcasts
    • Spotify
    • Other Services
  • Shop
    • T-shirts
    • Coaching Plans
  • About LetsRun.com
    • What's LetsRun.com?
    • Contact
    • Advertise

Post a Reply

Replying to not a nike shrill (post #61). View original post.

Leave the password field blank to post anonymously.

  • Register an Account
  • Forgot Username?
  • Forgot Password?
Note: We have detected you are using Firefox on Android. The editor has known issues with Android Firefox and may be difficult to use. We are both working with the developers to fix it and developing an alternative. If you encounter issues, please use a different browser to post.
Post Preview
By posting you acknowledge that you have read and abide by our Terms and Conditions.
If you are having trouble posting, please visit the Message Board troubleshooting page.

Replying To:

Track and field's shoe rule needs to be rewritten

not a nike shrill

While I agree with you I've also seen great performances by athletes wearing Skechers, Adidas, New Balance, Brooks, Mizuno, and Hoka shoes for example.

How do we know what's in their shoes isn't 3% more efficient?

While Nike was probably first to explode this onto the scene with their exclusive vaporflys there has been no monitoring of any company's exclusive shoes other than a few posters on LRC.

Maybe we need a WADA equivalent of shoe testing - like for a patent office before it gets worn in competition. But then we need a science of sport that outlines exactly as what constitutes a benefit.

Back to this thread.