This interesting part was in the summary of decision: "In this regard, reference has been made to the following main issues: The difficulty to rely on concrete evidence of actual (in contrast to theoretical) significant athletic advantage by a sufficient number of 46 XY DSD athletes in the 1500m and 1 mile events. The CAS Panel suggested that the IAAF consider deferring the application of the DSD Regulations to these events until more evidence is available. "
which hints at the IAAF study not being that strong I think.
Nah. It means there is not enough athletes in that subset to run a significant trial.
No lady is going to own up to it, and those that are benefiting are not going to stick their head ave the parapet.
Its like the definition of obscenity. You can't define it but know it when you see it.
IN her case they said the decision was made for the integrity of women's sport, even though it cut out high T ladies.
And lets be straight. Semenya highest T was / is over 1000. That's body builder range.