Here's looking at you kid
wejo wrote:
Clam Evans wrote:Would have been bad if he ran 2:00:01 and the clock said 1:59:59
Ha that photo would have been everywhere unaltered.
george oscar bluth wrote:
That's exactly what I would expect them to do and what they ought to do if they have any business sense. What is so hilarious about it?
You can't photoshop photos you send out to the media pretending they are editorial shots. It's just bad form. In a marketing world sure everything lines up, but sometimes in a real world it doesn't. Reason I noticed the photoshopping was because I didn't like how the photos we had had 2:00:23. It bugged me. I now see what the top marketer in the world does in that case - change reality.
You and your brother are the last bunch that should be pointing out "bad form".